Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Amaral v. Saint Cloud Hospital, 598 N.W.2d 379.

308 citing documents.

In re the Welfare of J.J.P. 831 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 2013
City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments Partnership 827 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2013
Thao v. Command Center, Inc. 824 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Thao v. Command Center, Inc. 824 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, VIN 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYH 821 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2012
Patino v. One 2007 Chevrolet, VIN 1GNFC16017J255427, Texas License Plate 578VYH 821 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 2012
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 818 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 818 N.W.2d 552 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Whenever possible, a statute should be interpreted to give effect to all of its provisions; “no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant.”
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 813 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Marine Credit Union v. Detlefson-Delano 813 N.W.2d 429 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M. 812 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
In re the Financial Responsibility for the Out-of-Home Placement Costs for S.M. 812 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 813 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 2012
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 813 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 2012
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership 811 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2012
Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership 811 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 2012
Christianson v. Henke 812 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Christianson v. Henke 812 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Emerson v. Board of Independent School District 199 809 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 2012
Emerson v. Board of Independent School District 199 809 N.W.2d 679 Minn. 2012
Cisar v. Slyter 812 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Cisar v. Slyter 812 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
County of Grant v. Koser 809 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Pegelow 809 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
County of Grant v. Koser 809 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. Pegelow 809 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2011
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2011
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 2011
In re Individual 35W Bridge Litigation 806 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 2011
State v. Zais 805 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2011
State v. Zais 805 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2011
In re the Estate of Butler 803 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 2011
In re the Estate of Butler 803 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 2011
Cloud Hosp., ) (stating that, when possible, no word, phrase, or sentence of a statute should be deemed superfluous).
Dimke v. Farr 802 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Dimke v. Farr 802 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Minnwest Bank v. Arends 802 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Minnwest Bank v. Arends 802 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Leathers 799 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 2011
State v. Leathers 799 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 2011
“A statute is only ambiguous when the language therein is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation.” (citing Minn.Stat.
Matthews v. Eichorn Motors, Inc. 800 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Matthews v. Eichorn Motors, Inc. 800 N.W.2d 823 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
City of East Bethel v. Anoka County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 798 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
City of East Bethel v. Anoka County Housing & Redevelopment Authority 798 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Whenever possible, a statute should be interpreted to give effect to all of its provisions; “no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, or insignificant.”
Beecroft v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. 798 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Beecroft v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. 798 N.W.2d 78 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rodewald v. Taylor 797 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Rodewald v. Taylor 797 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Amcon Block & Precast, Inc. v. Suess 794 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Amcon Block & Precast, Inc. v. Suess 794 N.W.2d 386 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
“Whenever it is possible, no word, phrase, or sentence should be deemed superfluous, void, *390 or insignificant.”

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by