Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Senate of Minnesota, 10 Minn. 78.

55 citing documents.

Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Tom Hunt, Steve Simon, ... Minn. 2024
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Tom Hunt, Steve Simon, ... Minn. 2024
See In re Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78, 81 (1865).
State of Minnesota v. Blair Benedict Oberton Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Blair Benedict Oberton Minn. 2024
In re Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78, 81 (1865).
Tokvan Ly v. Jodi Harpstead, Minnesota Commissioner of Human Services 7 N.W.3d 560 Minn. 2024
Tokvan Ly v. Jodi Harpstead, Minnesota Commissioner of Human Services 7 N.W.3d 560 Minn. 2024
See In re Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78, 81 (1865).
Lisa Marie Winkowski, Minn. 2023
In re Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78, 81 (1865).
Glaze v. State 909 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2018
Glaze v. State 909 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 2018
See In re Application of the Senate , 10 Minn. 78 , 81 (1865).
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
Bicking v. City of Minneapolis 891 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2017
Bicking v. City of Minneapolis 891 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2017
The dissent, instead, turns to In re Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78 , 10 Gil.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie Foss 872 N.W.2d 524 Minn. 2015
See Minn. Const. art. III, § 1; In re Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78, 80 , 10 Gil.
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
877 (1926); In re Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78 (Gil.56) (1865).
State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013
Schowalter v. State 822 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 2012
Schowalter v. State 822 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 2012
But we do not issue advisory opinions and we do not “decide cases merely to establish precedent.” (noting that we “only decide actual controversies”); In re Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78 ( Gil.
State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State Ex Rel. Sviggum v. Hanson 732 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See Montgomery v. Minneapolis Fire Dep’t Relief Ass’n, 218 Minn. 27, 29-30 , (interpreting predecessor of Minn. Const, art. VI, § 3, to require that “the subject matter of the suit is a justiciable one and therefore within the competence of the district court to hear and determine”); In re Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78 (1865) (noting that separation-of-powers provision in Minn. Const, art. Ill, § 1, limits court to “judicial” acts).
Scheibel v. Pavlak 282 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1979
Scheibel v. Pavlak 282 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1979
In the Matter of the Application of the Senate, 10 Minn. 78 ( Gil.
Hahn v. Graham 225 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1975
Minnesota Civil Liberties Union v. State 224 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1974
Johnson v. Trnka 154 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1967
Fitzgerald v. Morlock 120 N.W.2d 339 Minn. 1963
Christenson v. Allen 119 N.W.2d 35 Minn. 1963
Rolvaag v. Donovan 119 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1962
In Re Application of Andersen 264 Minn. 257 Minn. 1962
Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 115 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1962
State Ex Rel. Town of White Bear v. City of White Bear Lake 95 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1959
Green v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 1 89 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1958
In Re Order of Sammons, Co. Superintendent of Schools 242 Minn. 345 Minn. 1954
State ex rel. Klitzke v. Independent Consolidated School District No. 88 61 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1953
State Ex Rel. Maffett v. Turnbull 3 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1942
Kellerman v. City of St. Paul 1 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1941
Ferguson v. City of Morris 267 N.W. 254 Minn. 1936
Hagen v. Consolidated School District No. 111-74 194 N.W. 756 Minn. 1923
Nelson v. Bullard 194 N.W. 308 Minn. 1923
Berg v. Veit 162 N.W. 522 Minn. 1917
Eikmeier v. Steffen 155 N.W. 92 Minn. 1915
Clayton v. Prince 151 N.W. 911 Minn. 1915
McEwen v. Prince 147 N.W. 275 Minn. 1914
State v. Twin City Telephone Co. 116 N.W. 835 Minn. 1908
State ex rel. Douglas v. Falk 94 N.W. 879 Minn. 1903
State ex rel. Greene v. Hugo 86 N.W. 784 Minn. 1901
Smith v. Board of County Commissioners 65 N.W. 956 Minn. 1896
Soper v. County of Sibley 48 N.W. 1112 Minn. 1891
Stemper v. Higgins 37 N.W. 95 Minn. 1888

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by