Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Senate of Minnesota, 10 Minn. 78.

55 citing documents.

  • Quinn v. Markoe 35 N.W. 263 Minn. 1887
  • State ex rel. County Treasurer of Mille Lacs County v. Dike 20 Minn. 363 Minn. 1874
  • State ex rel. County Treasurer of Mille Lacs County v. Dike 20 Minn. 363 Minn. 1874
    The circumstance that the relator joins with the *367 respondent in this application, and that it is made in the form of a judicial proceeding, of wbicb we have no jurisdiction, is not sufficient to distinguish the case, in principle, from a similar application by the respondent alone, which we should be obliged to refuse for'the reasons stated in 10 Minn. 78 , (In the matter of the application of the Senate,) and approved in Rice vs. Jhistin, supra.
  • Rice v. Austin 19 Minn. 103 Minn. 1872
  • Rice v. Austin 19 Minn. 103 Minn. 1872
    With this request, we must respectfully decline to comply for the reasons expressed by us upon a similar application by the senate in 10 Minn. 78 .