Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Martin v. Ueland, 15 N.W. 245.

68 citing documents.

Leslie v. Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts 259 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1977
Leslie v. Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts 259 N.W.2d 898 Minn. 1977
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , 15 N.W.
Sherman v. Bureau of Catholic Charities 63 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1954
Sherman v. Bureau of Catholic Charities 63 N.W.2d 573 Minn. 1954
Martin v. Ueland, 80 Minn. 277, 281 , , speaking through Mr. Justice Mitchell, recognized that under some circumstances a certain concurrent jurisdiction exists in the district court when it said: “* * * Neither do we mean to decide that there may not be cases where the district court would have concurrent jurisdiction with the probate court, where t
Vesey v. Vesey 53 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1952
Vesey v. Vesey 53 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1952
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Comstock v. Matthews, 55 Minn. 111 , ; 21 Minn. L. Rev. 211 ; 23 Id.
Jasperson Ex Rel. Drew v. Jacobson 27 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1947
Jasperson Ex Rel. Drew v. Jacobson 27 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1947
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , .
Kemmetmueller v. Zachman 18 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1945
Kemmetmueller v. Zachman 18 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1945
Minn. Const, art. 6, § 7, provides: “* probate court shall have jurisdiction over the estates of deceased persons and persons under guardianship, but no other jurisdiction, except as prescribed by this Constitution.” In State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277, 281 , , Mr. Justice Mitchell, speaking for the court, said: “It was clearly the intention of the constitution to give the probate courts the entire and exclusive jurisdiction over the estates of deceased persons and persons under guardianship, in th
Rickel v. Peck 2 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1942
In Re Guardianship of Overpeck 2 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1942
In Re Guardianship of Overpeck 2 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1942
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , 15 N.W.
Rickel v. Peck 2 N.W.2d 140 Minn. 1942
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , , and to direct a guardian to require a bond to secure the bank deposits of his ward.
In Re Guardianship of Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
Abrahamson v. Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
Abrahamson v. Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
“Jurisdiction over persons under guardianship includes not only the appointment of guardians and the control of their official action, but the care and protection of the estates of wards, formerly vested in the court of chancery.” Dunnell, Minn. Probate Law, § 27; State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277, 282 , .
In Re Guardianship of Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
Dunnell, Minn. Probate Law, § 27; State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , 282 , 15 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court 283 N.W. 545 Minn. 1938
In Re Estate of Peterson 277 N.W. 529 Minn. 1938
Swenson v. Board of Christian Service 277 N.W. 529 Minn. 1938
In Re Estate of Peterson 277 N.W. 529 Minn. 1938
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , 15 N.W.
Swenson v. Board of Christian Service 277 N.W. 529 Minn. 1938
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Appleby v. Watkins, 95 Minn. 455 , , 5 Ann. Cas.
Carey v. Brown 260 N.W. 320 Minn. 1935
In Re Estate of Carey 260 N.W. 320 Minn. 1935
Carey v. Brown 260 N.W. 320 Minn. 1935
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Washburn v. Van Steenwyk, 32 Minn. 336 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , ; Fairchild v. Marshall, 42 Minn. 14 , ; State ex rel.
In Re Estate of O'Connor 253 N.W. 18 Minn. 1934
O'Connor v. St. Joseph's Provincial House 253 N.W. 18 Minn. 1934
O'Connor v. St. Joseph's Provincial House 253 N.W. 18 Minn. 1934
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277, 281 , .
In Re Estate of O'Connor 253 N.W. 18 Minn. 1934
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , 281 , 15 N.W.
Snicker v. Byers 224 N.W. 152 Minn. 1929
Snicker v. Byers 224 N.W. 152 Minn. 1929
Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225, 234 , ; Fiske v. Lawton, 124 Minn. 85, 91 , ; State ex rel.
Melby v. Nelson 211 N.W. 465 Minn. 1926
Melby v. Nelson 211 N.W. 465 Minn. 1926
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , .
Scott v. Whitely 209 N.W. 640 Minn. 1926
Scott v. Whitely 209 N.W. 640 Minn. 1926
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Dun.
O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , .
Wilson ex rel. Mitchell v. Erickson 180 N.W. 93 Minn. 1920
Wilson ex rel. Mitchell v. Erickson 180 N.W. 93 Minn. 1920
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; State v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Appleby v. Watkins, 95 Minn. 455 , , 5 Ann. Cas.
Fischer v. Hintz 176 N.W. 177 Minn. 1920
Fischer v. Hintz 176 N.W. 177 Minn. 1920
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Wiswell v. Wiswell, 35 Minn. 371 , ; In re Scheffer’s Estate, 58 Minn. 29 , ; Boltz v. Schutz, 61 Minn. 444 , ; Starkey v. Sweeney, 71 Minn. 241 , *164 ; Betcher v. Betcher, 83 Minn. 215 , ; Brown v. Strom, 113 Minn. 1 , 129 N W. 136; State
State ex rel. Benz v. Probate Court 155 N.W. 906 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Benz v. Probate Court 155 N.W. 906 Minn. 1916
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Betcher v. Betcher, 83 Minn. 215 , ; Fitzpatrick v. Simonson Bros. Mnfg.
Fiske v. Lawton 144 N.W. 455 Minn. 1913
Fiske v. Lawton 144 N.W. 455 Minn. 1913
This is pointed out by Chief Justice Gilfillan, in Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225, 234 , , and in the same case, at page 233, we find the following, quoted from the opinion of Mr. Justice Mitchell in State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277, 281 , , reaffirmed: “It was clearly the intention of the constitution to give the probate courts the entire and exclusive jurisdiction over the estates of deceased persons and persons under guardianship, in the same manner and to the same extent that it gives to t
Estate of Nordquist v. Sahlbom 131 N.W. 323 Minn. 1911
Estate of Nordquist v. Sahlbom 131 N.W. 323 Minn. 1911
And though, if the survivor be insane and incapable personally of making the election, it may perhaps be made by a duly constituted guardian, or by the probate court (State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Washburn v. Van Steenwyk, 32 Minn. 336 , ; State v. Hunt, 88 Minn. 404 , ), the right is personal to the surviving spouse, and does not pass on his or her death to the personal representative or heirs.
Brown v. Strom 129 N.W. 136 Minn. 1910
Brown v. Strom 129 N.W. 136 Minn. 1910
See Cone v. Hooper, 18 Minn. 476 (531); Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; State v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Wiswell v. Wiswell, 35 Minn. 371 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , ; Reiser v. Gigrich, 59 Minn. 368 , ; Boltz v.Schutz, 61 Minn. 444 , ; Starkey v. Sweeney, 71 Minn. 241 , 73