Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Martin v. Ueland, 15 N.W. 245.

68 citing documents.

Wellner v. Eckstein 117 N.W. 830 Minn. 1908
Hanson v. Nygaard 117 N.W. 235 Minn. 1908
Hanson v. Nygaard 117 N.W. 235 Minn. 1908
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , ; Appleby v. Watkins, 95 Minn. 455 , ; Fitzpatrick v. Simonson Bros. Mnfg.
State ex rel. Union National Bank v. Probate Court 115 N.W. 173 Minn. 1908
State ex rel. Union National Bank v. Probate Court 115 N.W. 173 Minn. 1908
Relator lays much stress upon the decision of State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , .
Appleby v. Watkins 104 N.W. 301 Minn. 1905
Appleby v. Watkins 104 N.W. 301 Minn. 1905
It has been held in the following cases that this jurisdiction is exclusive: State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Boltz v. Schutz, 61 Minn. 444 , ; Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Betcher v. Betcher, 83 Minn. 215 , .
Starkey v. Sweeney 73 N.W. 859 Minn. 1898
Starkey v. Sweeney 73 N.W. 859 Minn. 1898
The district court has no original jurisdiction as to these matters., Jacobs v. Fouse, 28 Minn. 51 ; State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , ; Boltz v. Schutz, 61 Minn. 444 , ; Luse v. Reed, 63 Minn. 11 , .
Boltz v. Schutz 64 N.W. 48 Minn. 1895
Boltz v. Schutz 64 N.W. 48 Minn. 1895
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , .
Mousseau v. Mousseau 41 N.W. 977 Minn. 1889
Culver v. Hardenbergh 33 N.W. 792 Minn. 1887
Culver v. Hardenbergh 33 N.W. 792 Minn. 1887
Though no such power is mentioned in the statute, yet this court decided in State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
In re the Final Account of Besondy 20 N.W. 366 Minn. 1884
In re the Final Account of Besondy 20 N.W. 366 Minn. 1884
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 ; Willard, Eq.
Washburn v. Van Steenwyk 20 N.W. 324 Minn. 1884
Washburn v. Van Steenwyk 20 N.W. 324 Minn. 1884
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 .