Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnston Harvester Co. v. Clare, 15 N.W. 252.
- Chisholm Water Supply Co. v. City of Chisholm 287 N.W. 493 Minn. 1939
-
Chisholm Water Supply Co. v. City of Chisholm
287 N.W. 493
Minn. 1939
Then we are cited to Johnston Harvester Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , ; Campbell v. Worman, 58 Minn. 561 , .
- Schutz v. Interstate Contracting Co. 265 N.W. 296 Minn. 1936
-
Schutz v. Interstate Contracting Co.
265 N.W. 296
Minn. 1936
Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , ; Campbell v. Worman, 58 Minn. 561 , .
- First National Bank of Herman v. Cargill Elevator Co. 192 N.W. 111 Minn. 1923
-
First National Bank of Herman v. Cargill Elevator Co.
192 N.W. 111
Minn. 1923
See Campbell v. Worman, 58 Minn. 561 , ; Johnston H. Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , ; Pinney v. Jorgenson, 27 Minn. 26 , .
- First State Bank v. Utman 161 N.W. 398 Minn. 1917
-
First State Bank v. Utman
161 N.W. 398
Minn. 1917
See Campbell v. Worman, 58 Minn. 561 , ; Johnston Harvester Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , .
- National City Bank v. Zimmer Vacuum Renovator Co. 156 N.W. 265 Minn. 1916
-
National City Bank v. Zimmer Vacuum Renovator Co.
156 N.W. 265
Minn. 1916
Johnston Harvester Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , ; Moore v. Holmes, 68 Minn. 108 , .
- Dimond v. Minnesota Savings Bank 73 N.W. 182 Minn. 1897
- Continental Insurance v. Richardson 72 N.W. 458 Minn. 1897
-
Continental Insurance v. Richardson
72 N.W. 458
Minn. 1897
Johnston v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , .
- Thorpe v. Hanscom 66 N.W. 1 Minn. 1896
-
Thorpe v. Hanscom
66 N.W. 1
Minn. 1896
The defendant assigns this as error, and relies upon Johnston H. Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , .
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Doucette 63 N.W. 95 Minn. 1895
-
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Doucette
63 N.W. 95
Minn. 1895
Thus, in Johnston Harvester Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , , it was held that an answer verified by the attorney, denying the execution of the instrument, was not such a denial, upon oath, of the execution of the-instrument, as to put the plaintiff to other proof than such as the instrument itself afforded by virtue of the statute.
- Campbell v. Worman 60 N.W. 668 Minn. 1894
-
Campbell v. Worman
60 N.W. 668
Minn. 1894
Pinney v. Jorgenson, 27 Minn. 26 , ( ;) Johnston Harvester Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , ( .)
- Duluth Loan & Land Co. v. Klovdahl 56 N.W. 1119 Minn. 1893
- Jewell v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United Workmen 43 N.W. 88 Minn. 1889
-
Jewell v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United Workmen
43 N.W. 88
Minn. 1889
354 ;) Johnston Harvester Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
- Harris Manufacturing Co. v. Anfinson 17 N.W. 274 Minn. 1883
-
Harris Manufacturing Co. v. Anfinson
17 N.W. 274
Minn. 1883
This case is ruled by Johnston Harvester Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , in which we held a stipulation (contained in a machine note) for the payment of an attorney’s fee in case of suit, valid.