DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schleuder v. Corey, 16 N.W. 401.

26 citing documents.

  • Marcum v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. 30 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1947
  • Marcum v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co. 30 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1947
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , .
  • Starks v. Starks 19 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1945
  • Starks v. Starks 19 N.W.2d 741 Minn. 1945
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , .
  • Raymond v. McKenzie 19 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1945
  • Raymond v. McKenzie 19 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1945
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , .
  • Kozisek v. Brigham 237 N.W. 25 Minn. 1931
  • Kozisek v. Brigham 237 N.W. 25 Minn. 1931
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ; Adamson v. Sundby, 51 Minn. 460 , ; Tilleny v. Wolverton, 54 Minn. 75 , ; Maxwell v. Schwartz, 55 Minn. 414 , ; *460 Bradley v. Norris, 67 Minn. 48 , ; Hibbs v. Marpe, 84 Minn. 178 , ; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , 87 N. W
  • School District No. 1, Itasca County v. Aiton 221 N.W. 424 Minn. 1928
  • School District No. 1, Itasca County v. Aiton 221 N.W. 424 Minn. 1928
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ; Tilleny v. Wolverton, 54 Minn. 75 , ; Hibbs v. Marpe, 84 Minn. 178 , .
  • Orr v. Sutton 148 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1914
  • Orr v. Sutton 148 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1914
    That decision, whether right or wrong, must be treated as tbe law of tbe case and tbe question cannot be re-examined at tbis time.” Tbe same rule was stated thus in Bradley v. Norris, 67 Minn. 48 , : “This court has tbe right to overrule tbe decision made on tbe former appeal in some other case, but in tbis case it must be followed.” See also Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ; Smith v. Glover, 50 Minn. 58 , ; Tilleny v. Wolverton, 54 Minn. 75 , ; Maxwell v. Schwartz, 55 Minn. 414 , ; St.
  • Minnesota Land & Immigration Co. v. Munch 136 N.W. 1026 Minn. 1912
  • Minnesota Land & Immigration Co. v. Munch 136 N.W. 1026 Minn. 1912
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ; Hibbs v. Marpe, 84 Minn. 178 , .
  • Banks v. Pennsylvania Railroad 126 N.W. 410 Minn. 1910
  • Banks v. Pennsylvania Railroad 126 N.W. 410 Minn. 1910
    It was held in Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , , *52 that where, upon appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial, the order was affirmed under rule No. 14 for failure" of appellant to serve a paper book and brief, all questions which might have been raised on the appeal were res adjudicata and could not be considered on an appeal from the
  • Hibbs v. Marpe 87 N.W. 363 Minn. 1901
  • Hibbs v. Marpe 87 N.W. 363 Minn. 1901
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ; Adamson v. Sundby, 51 Minn. 460, 464 , ; Tilleny v. Wolverton, supra.
  • Bradley v. Norris 69 N.W. 624 Minn. 1896
  • Bradley v. Norris 69 N.W. 624 Minn. 1896
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ; Maxwell v. Schwartz, 55 Minn. 414 , ; Johnson v. Northwestern T. E. Co., 54 Minn. 37 , ; Tilleny v. Wolverton, 54 Minn. 75 , ; Elliott, App. Proc.
  • Maxwell v. Schwartz 57 N.W. 141 Minn. 1893
  • Maxwell v. Schwartz 57 N.W. 141 Minn. 1893
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ( .)
  • Tilleny v. Wolverton 55 N.W. 822 Minn. 1893
  • Tilleny v. Wolverton 55 N.W. 822 Minn. 1893
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ( 16 N. W. Rep.
  • Adamson v. Sundby 53 N.W. 761 Minn. 1892
  • Adamson v. Sundby 53 N.W. 761 Minn. 1892
    Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ( 16 N. W. Rep.