Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Hart v. Common Council, 55 N.W. 118.

87 citing documents.

Deli v. University of Minnesota 511 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Deli v. University of Minnesota 511 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
Dietz v. Dodge County 487 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1992
Dietz v. Dodge County 487 N.W.2d 237 Minn. 1992
Hart v. Common Council of City of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238 , 55 N.W.
Caldwell v. City of Minneapolis 486 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Caldwell v. City of Minneapolis 486 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Hart v. Common Council of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
City of Minneapolis v. Moe 450 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
City of Minneapolis v. Moe 450 N.W.2d 367 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
City of Minneapolis v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
City of Minneapolis v. Johnson 450 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Larkin 415 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Proposed Discharge of Larkin 415 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
Gruening v. Pinotti 392 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Gruening v. Pinotti 392 N.W.2d 670 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hart v. Common Council of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
In re LaFond 390 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re LaFond 390 N.W.2d 321 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State ex rel Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
Matter of Recommendation for Discharge of Kelvie 384 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Matter of Recommendation for Discharge of Kelvie 384 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hart, et al. v. Common Council of City of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238 , 55 N.W.
In re Administrative Appeal of the Termination of Employment 374 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Administrative Appeal of the Termination of Employment 374 N.W.2d 754 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
Thompson v. City of Appleton 366 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Thompson v. City of Appleton 366 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
In Re Arbitration County of Cass & Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 353 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re Arbitration County of Cass & Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. 353 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
Kunze v. White Bear Lake Police Civil Service Commission 319 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1982
Kunze v. White Bear Lake Police Civil Service Commission 319 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1982
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , 55 N.W.
Leininger v. City of Bloomington 299 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1980
Leininger v. City of Bloomington 299 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1980
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , 55 N.W.
Thoreson v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF ST. PAUL 242 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1976
Thoreson v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF ST. PAUL 242 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1976
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , as follows: “* * * The cause must be one which specially relates to and affects the administration of the office, and must be restricted to something of a substantial nature directly affecting the rights and interests of the public.
Mahnerd v. Canfield 211 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1973
Mahnerd v. Canfield 211 N.W.2d 177 Minn. 1973
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238
Ekstedt v. Village of New Hope 193 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1972
Ekstedt v. Village of New Hope 193 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1972
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , as follows: “* * * ‘Cause,’ or ‘sufficient cause,’ means ‘legal cause,’ and not any cause which the council may think sufficient.
Gibson v. Civil Service Board 171 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1969
Gibson v. Civil Service Board 171 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1969
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , , wherein this court said: “* * * ‘causej’ or ‘sufficient cause,’ means ‘legal cause,’ and not any cause which the council may think sufficient.
Nodes v. City of Hastings 170 N.W.2d 92 Minn. 1969
Wilson v. City of Minneapolis 168 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1969
Wilson v. City of Minneapolis 168 N.W.2d 19 Minn. 1969
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 245 , 55 N. W. *354 118, 120; Johnson v. Village of Cohasset, 263 Minn. 425 , 116 N. W. (2d) 692 ; Amos Treat & Co. v. Securities and Exch.
Hagen v. State Civil Service Board 164 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1969
Hagen v. State Civil Service Board 164 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1969
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 244 , , where it was said: *299 “* * * ‘Cause,’ or ‘sufficient cause,’ means ‘legal cause,’ and not any cause which the council may think sufficient.
Jenson v. Olson 141 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1966
Jenson v. Olson 141 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1966
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 242 , ; State ex rel.
Webster v. Marshall 133 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1965
Webster v. Marshall 133 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1965
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 242 , ; Steenerson v. G. N. Ry.
State Ex Rel. Jenson v. Civil Service Commission 130 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1964
State Ex Rel. Jenson v. Civil Service Commission 130 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 1964
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , ; Jacobsen v. Nagel, 255 Minn. 300 , 96 N. W. (2d) 569 .
Sabes v. City of Minneapolis 120 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1963
Sabes v. City of Minneapolis 120 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1963
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , , which reviewed the action of a munici *170 pality in discharging two city employees.
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood 117 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1962