Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Hart v. Common Council, 55 N.W. 118.

87 citing documents.

Haaland v. Pomush 117 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1962
Cederstrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood 117 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1962
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , .
Haaland v. Pomush 117 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1962
10 State v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 242 , .
State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Police Civil Service Commission 91 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Police Civil Service Commission 91 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1958
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , , it was pointed out that a given function may, by the manner it is performed, be a quasi-judicial function and therefore permit review on certiorari.
Sellin v. City of Duluth 80 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1956
Sellin v. City of Duluth 80 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1956
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , , it was contended that the proceedings of the common council in removing two members of the Board of Fire Commissioners could not be reviewed on certiorari because the decision was purely administrative and quasi-political.
Beck v. Council of City of St. Paul 50 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1951
Beck v. Council of City of St. Paul 50 N.W.2d 81 Minn. 1951
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , ; Townsend v. Common Council, 71 Minn. 379 , ; In re Application for Removal of Wm.
State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of Education 7 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1942
State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of Education 7 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1942
Hart v. Common Council, 58 Minn. 238 , , 39 A. S. R. 595; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Rockwell v. State Board of Education 6 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1942
State Ex Rel. Rockwell v. State Board of Education 6 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1942
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , , 39 A. S. R. 595.
Hughes v. Department of Public Safety 273 N.W. 618 Minn. 1937
Hughes v. Department of Public Safety 273 N.W. 618 Minn. 1937
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238, 246 , , 39 A. S. R. 595, said: “We agree with counsel that ‘incompetency’ and ‘inefficiency’ in the discharge of official duty may be good grounds for removal, and that it may not be necessary to specify in detail particular acts or facts.
State Ex Rel. Birkeland v. Christianson 229 N.W. 313 Minn. 1930
State Ex Rel. Birkeland v. Christianson 229 N.W. 313 Minn. 1930
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , , 39 A. S. R. 595, the rule was recognized that certiorari will lie to review the quasi judicial acts and proceedings of municipal officers *341 and bodies, and the limitations as to questions which may be reviewed are stated.
State Ex Rel. Hardstone Brick Co. of Appleton, Inc. v. Department of Commerce 219 N.W. 81 Minn. 1928
State Ex Rel. Hardstone Brick Co. of Appleton, Inc. v. Department of Commerce 219 N.W. 81 Minn. 1928
Hart v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , , 39 A. S. R. 595; State ex rel.
In re Mason 181 N.W. 570 Minn. 1920
In re Mason 181 N.W. 570 Minn. 1920
State v. Common Council of City of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238 , 55 N. W. *387 118 , 39 Am.
State ex rel. Martin v. Burnquist 170 N.W. 201 Minn. 1918
State ex rel. Martin v. Burnquist 170 N.W. 201 Minn. 1918
State v. Common Council of City of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238 , , 39 Am.
Bainbridge v. City of Minneapolis 154 N.W. 964 Minn. 1915
Bainbridge v. City of Minneapolis 154 N.W. 964 Minn. 1915
261; State v. Schoenig, 72 Minn. 528 , ; State v. Common Council of City of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238 , , 39 Am.
State ex rel. Furlong v. McColl 149 N.W. 11 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Furlong v. McColl 149 N.W. 11 Minn. 1914
State v. Common Council of City of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238 , .
Webb v. Lucas 147 N.W. 273 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Sholund v. Mayor & Common Council 147 N.W. 820 Minn. 1914
Webb v. Lucas 147 N.W. 273 Minn. 1914
Paul v. Marvin, 16 Minn. 91 (102); De Rochebrune v. Southeimer, 12 Minn. 42 (78); State v. Common Council of City of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238 , , 39 Am.
State ex rel. Sholund v. Mayor & Common Council 147 N.W. 820 Minn. 1914
(N. Y.) 277; State v. Common Council of City of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238 , , 39 Am.
Sykes v. City of Minneapolis 144 N.W. 453 Minn. 1913
Sykes v. City of Minneapolis 144 N.W. 453 Minn. 1913
Thus it is said in State v. Common Council of City of Duluth, 53 Minn. 238 , , 39 Am.
State ex rel. Kinsella v. Eberhart 133 N.W. 857 Minn. 1911
State ex rel. Kinsella v. Eberhart 133 N.W. 857 Minn. 1911
The rules by which the court is guided in such proceedings are fully stated in State v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , , 39 Am.
Townsend v. Common Council 74 N.W. 150 Minn. 1898
Townsend v. Common Council 74 N.W. 150 Minn. 1898
As held in State v. Common Council, 53 Minn. 238 , , a removal for cause must be for legal cause; and the court, on certiorari, “will examine the evidence, not for the purpose of weighing it, but to ascertain whether it furnished any legal and substantial basis for the removal.” We are of the opinion that in the present case the evidence does not furnis