| a241128 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2026-01-26 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Romaine Anthony Reid
|
|
… 2 filed a Blakely motion seeking an upward aggravated sentencing departure based on the alleged aggravating factor of multiple forms of penetration. 1 By February 23, 2023, when Reid appeared for a domesti …
|
| a230134 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2023-12-04 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola Johnson
|
|
… by imposing consecutive stayed prison sentences without stating reasons for a sentencing departure. Therefore, we affirm Arola Johnson’s convictions but reverse the imposition of consecutive stayed prison sentences and remand for imposi …
|
| A16-392 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2017-01-17 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Peter Clare Hoagland
|
|
… I.D.2.b (1992). “Generally, the district court may impose an upward durational sentencing departure if the evidence shows that the defendant committed the offense in a particularly serious way.” State v. Hicks, 864 N.W.2d 153, 157 (Minn. …
|
| A15-1607 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-12-12 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Bryan Blocker
|
|
… he course of the kidnapping. Respondent State of Minnesota moved for an upward sentencing departure, and the district court submitted a special verdict form to the jury with ten questions to find the existence of aggravating facts. The j …
|
| A15-1417 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-10-05 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota v. Devon Derrick Parker
|
|
… hange of venue, and (2) abused its discretion by imposing an upward durational sentencing departure based on the fact that the crime occurred in the victim’s zone of privacy. Because the district court acted within its discretion in denyi …
|
| A15-1247 |
Minn. Ct. App. |
2016-07-18 |
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
|
State of Minnesota, (A15-1247), (A15-1255) v. Randall Samuel Stempfley, (A15-1247), (A15-…
|
|
… me Court adopted the following general rules governing when a district court’s sentencing departure may be affirmed or reversed: 1. If no reasons for departure are stated on the record at the time of sen …
|