Minnesota Appellate Opinions

Published opinions of the Minnesota Supreme Court and Court of Appeals, collated from public records. 7 opinions matched.

Filtering by: Modified “Miranda” Full archive · 1930–present Limit to last 10 years Clear ×

Docket	Court	Filed	Disposition	Case
A08-1331	Minn.	2009-09-10	Modified	State v. Buckingham
… testified that, during the February 14 interview, following administration of a Miranda warning, Buckingham admitted that he was at Gabby’s on February 10. On March 6, after contacting the police from jail on several occasions wanting to ta …
C6-88-1171	Minn. Ct. App.	1989-02-28	Modified	State v. Brant
… ecord contains ample evidence that appellant was informed of and understood his Miranda rights. His attorney was present during interrogation. In addition, appellant does not point to any inaccuracies or falsities in the confession transcri …
No. C4-86-1763	Minn. Ct. App.	1987-07-21	Modified	State v. C.J.M.
… unrelated charges. During this time, Holden interviewed him. After reading the Miranda rights, Holden incorrectly stated that blood tests proved appellant fathered the unborn child and that there were witnesses to the rape. Appellant began …
C2-86-2054	Minn. Ct. App.	1987-06-02	Modified	Vivier v. Commissioner of Public Safety
… not convert an ordinary traffic stop into a de facto arrest so as to require a Miranda warning. State v. Herem, 384 N.W.2d 880, 883 (Minn.1986). The officer’s opening of the car door did not constitute an arrest of the respondent. II. The …
C8-86-373	Minn. Ct. App.	1986-07-01	Modified	State v. Lopez
… ion a few months earlier. Officer Anderson arrested respondent and read him the Miranda warning. Respondent was taken to police headquarters, .where he refused to submit to a breath test. He was videotaped before contacting an attorney. Res …
C7-85-1228	Minn. Ct. App.	1986-04-01	Modified	State v. Friend
… trial court erred by admitting an oral statement made by appellant, prior to a Miranda warning and allegedly while in custody and in response to interrogation; (3) the prosecutor’s comments during closing argument and questions during voir …
43571	Minn.	1973-11-02	Modified	State v. Loyd
… s and that defendant was a suspect in that robbery. He then gave him a standard Miranda *444 warning but did not inform defendant of the possibility that he might be prosecuted as an adult. Defendant and his parents acknowledged that they u …