Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hewetson v. Dossett, 73 N.W. 1089.

13 citing documents.

Troy Kenneth Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Barnabas A. Yohannes, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
James Jesse Hunter, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co., 73 N.W. 1089, 1090 (Minn. 1898)).
Paul Swartwood, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, e.g., Moreno, American Book Co. v. Kingdom Publ’g Co.
Gabrielle Huson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dennis Lougee v. Craig Eugene Pehrson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., 71 Minn. 363, 366, (stating that a defamation plaintiff must plead “specific alleged defamatory words”).
Creative Wealth Strategies, Inc. v. Kathy Jo Hurd Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But a party alleging defamation must plead “specific alleged defamatory words.” (citing American Book Co. v. Kingdom Publishing Co., 71 Minn. 363, 366, ), review denied (Minn. 19 Feb.
Stead-Bowers v. Langley 636 N.W.2d 334 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See American Book Co. v. Kingdom Publishing Co., 71 Minn. 363, 366 , (plaintiff in libel action may not merely plead effect or tenor or import of alleged defamatory language, but must plead specific alleged defamatory words).
Moreno v. Crookston Times Printing Co. 610 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2000
Criticized Special Force Ministries v. WCCO Television 584 N.W.2d 789 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Appellants criticize the defamation claims for failing to identify the exact defamatory language in their complaint, citing American Book Co. v. Kingdom Publishing Co., 71 Minn. 363, 366 , (plaintiff must set forth “precise words” in pleadings).
Baer v. Waseca Milling Company 171 N.W. 767 Minn. 1919
Co. 71 Minn. 363 , *Page 485 ; State v. O'Brien, 83 Minn. 6 , 85 N.W.
Overruled Lovering v. Webb Publishing Co. 120 N.W. 688 Minn. 1909
Co., 71 Minn. 363 , ; State v. O’Brien, 83 Minn. 6 , ; Pugh v. Winona & St.
State v. O'Brien 85 N.W. 1135 Minn. 1901
Co., 71 Minn. 363 , , we expressly disapprove tbe rule laid down in Pugb v. Winona & St.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by