Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 87 N.W. 915.

24 citing documents.

Jodi D. Campbell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Id.; (explaining that “where a partition of real property is the principa l object of the action, and the final judgment 12 results in benefit to all the parties concerne d, the court may, in its discretion, make a reasonable allowance to plaintiffs for necessary attorney’s fees”).4 Larson sugge
Eric D. Humphreys, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Kuller v. Kuller 109 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1961
This statute provides that ‘the costs, charges and disbursements of partition shall be paid by the parties respectively entitled to share in the land.’ * * * [In] Hanson v. Ingwaldson, 84 Minn. 346 , [the court stated at page 347] * *: *259 “ ‘It may be conceded that in partition cases, where a partition of real property is the principal object of the action, and the final judgment results in benefit to all parties concerned, the court may, in its discretion, make a reasonable allowance to plain
Cleveland v. County of Rice 56 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1952
Cleveland v. County of Rice 56 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1952
[5] State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 (open on Sunday); City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , 87 N.W.
State v. Weeks 12 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1943
State v. Weeks 12 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1943
In City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367, 369 , , this court passed upon the question.
State v. Houston 298 N.W. 358 Minn. 1941
State v. Houston 298 N.W. 358 Minn. 1941
State v. Lindquist, 77 Minn. 540 , ; *383 City of Jordan, v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , ; State v. Marciniak, 97 Minn. 355 , ; City of Virginia v. Erickson, 141 Minn. 21, 26 , ; City of Duluth v. Evans, 158 Minn. 450, 452 , .
City of Alexandria v. Viering 225 N.W. 286 Minn. 1929
City of Alexandria v. Viering 225 N.W. 286 Minn. 1929
1548; State v. Gill, 89 Minn. 502 , ; City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , .
City of Virginia v. Erickson 168 N.W. 821 Minn. 1918
City of Virginia v. Erickson 168 N.W. 821 Minn. 1918
State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 ; State v. Lee, 29 Minn. 445 , ; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 , ; State v. Lindquist, 77 Minn. 540 , ; City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , 87 N, W. 915; State v. Marciniak, 97 Minn. 355 , ; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co. 151 N.W. 1102 Minn. 1915
See Hanson v. Ingwaldson, 84 Minn. 346 , .
City of Mankato v. Olger 148 N.W. 471 Minn. 1914
City of Mankato v. Olger 148 N.W. 471 Minn. 1914
City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , .
State ex rel. Bullard v. McDonough 134 N.W. 509 Minn. 1912
State ex rel. Bullard v. McDonough 134 N.W. 509 Minn. 1912
State v. Peterson, 38 Minn. 143 , ; City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , ; sections 4031, 4542, 4776, 5242, B. L. 1905.
Evans v. City of Redwood Falls 115 N.W. 200 Minn. 1908
Evans v. City of Redwood Falls 115 N.W. 200 Minn. 1908
Therefore the charter provisions and ordinance in question were not repealed by the general law of 1887 regulating the *317 sale of intoxicating liquors.” See also State v. Scatena, 84 Minn. 281 , ; City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , ; State v. Marciniak, 97 Minn. 355 -357
State v. Marciniak 105 N.W. 965 Minn. 1906
Followed State v. Marciniak 105 N.W. 965 Minn. 1906
State v. Ludwig, 21 Minn. 202 ; State v. Harris, 50 Minn. 128 , ; State v. Lindquist, 77 Minn. 540 , ; City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , .
State v. Gill 95 N.W. 449 Minn. 1903
State v. Gill 95 N.W. 449 Minn. 1903
The case of City of Jordan v. Nicolin, 84 Minn. 367 , , relied upon by the defendant, does not hold that a complaint for the violation of an ordinance must conclude contrary to both the statute and the ordinance, nor does it approve of a complaint so concluding.