Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Petition for Integration of Bar of Minnesota, 12 N.W.2d 515.

42 citing documents.

Nathan Alexander Jefferson v. Drew Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Nathan Alexander Jefferson v. Drew Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(providing that the state constitution makes the supreme court the final authority in protection of the rights guaranteed by the constitution); -06 (Minn. 2015) (noting that the supreme court is “reluctant to expand the concept of substantive due process
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2023
Brent A. Ristow, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Minn. Stat. § 480.05 (2020); d 176, 179 (Minn. 1971); In re Greathouse, 248 N.W.
Moulton v. Simon 883 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2016
Moulton v. Simon 883 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 2016
which one is admitted only upon proof of fitness and qualification”); In re Petition for Integration of the Bar of Minn., 216 Minn. 195, 200 , (“The practice of law ...
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570 883 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 2016
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael John RIEHM, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0296570 883 N.W.2d 223 Minn. 2016
In re Petition for Integration of Bar of Minn., 216 Minn. 195, 199
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
Auth., 310 Minn. 313, 318-19, (explaining that the court adopted the code of professional responsibility pursuant to its authority to regulate the practice of law); Petition for Integration of Bar of Minn., 216 Minn. 195, 199, (stating “the making of regulations and rules governing the legal profession falls squarely within the judicial power thus exclusively reserved to the court.”).
Roman Nose v. State 845 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 2014
Roman Nose v. State 845 N.W.2d 193 Minn. 2014
Chambers, d at 341 (Anderson, Paul, J., dissenting) (citing In re Petition for Integration of the Bar of Minn., 216 Minn. 195, 199 , ); Chambers, d at 346 (Page, J., dissenting).
Chambers v. State 831 N.W.2d 311 Minn. 2013
State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013
State v. M.D.T. 815 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
State v. M.D.T. 815 N.W.2d 628 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
“The fundamental functions of a court are the administration of justice and the protection of the rights guaranteed by the constitution.” In re Petition for Integration of Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195, 199
In Re ADMONITION ISSUED IN PANEL FILE NO. 99-42 621 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2001
In Re ADMONITION ISSUED IN PANEL FILE NO. 99-42 621 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 2001
See In re Integration of Bar of Minn., 216 Minn. 195, 199
Baker v. Ploetz 616 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2000
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
Associated Builders & Contractors v. Ventura 610 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 2000
See, e.g., Petition for Integration of Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195, 199 , (“The supreme court is thereby made the final authority and last resort in [interpreting] * * * the constitution.”).
Irwin v. Surdyk's Liquor 599 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1999
Irwin v. Surdyk's Liquor 599 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1999
Similarly, in In re Petition for Integration of the Bar, 216 Minn. 195 , we stated: The fundamental functions of the court are the administration of justice and the protection of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
State v. T.M.B. 590 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. TMB 590 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. T.M.B. 590 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In re Petition for Integration of the Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195, 199
State v. TMB 590 N.W.2d 809 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In re Petition for Integration of the Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195, 199
State v. Berge 464 N.W.2d 595 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. Olson 372 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Itasca County Board of Commissioners v. Olson 372 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
2 See HRA at 318, d at 623 ; In re Petition for Integration of Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Minneapolis 251 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1976
Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority ex rel. City of Minneapolis 251 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1976
In the syllabus written by the court to the case of In re Petition for Integration of Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195 , , we said: “ ‘ * * * [T]he power to make the necessary rules and regulations governing the bar was intended to be vested exclusively in the supreme court, free from the dangers of encroachment either by the legislative or executive branches * * Consistent with this pronouncement, this court had ad
Clerk of Court's Comp. for LC v. LC Com'rs 241 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1976
In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Compensation 241 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1976
In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' Compensation 241 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1976
Sharood v. Hatfield, 296 Minn. 416 , (disposition of bar fees); In re Petition for Integration of the Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195 , Cowern v. Nelson, 207 Minn. 642 , (statute regulating general practice of law); In re Disbarment *178 of Tracy, 197 Minn. 35 , , (statutes regulating disbarment).
Clerk of Court's Comp. for LC v. LC Com'rs 241 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1976
Sharood v. Hatfield, 296 Minn. 416 , (disposition of bar fees); In re Petition for Integration of the Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195 , Cowern v. Nelson, 207 Minn. 642 , 290 N.W.
Sharood v. Hatfield 210 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1973
Sharood v. Hatfield 210 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1973
In In re Petition for Integration of Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195, 197 , we pointed out that the “exact number of attorneys in the state is uncertain.” It remained so until the annual registration of lawyers became effective.
State v. Lorenz 50 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1951
State v. Lorenz 50 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1951
3 The following have been considered in reaching this opinion: Minn. Const. art. 1, §§ 2, 6, 7; art. 3, § 1; art. 4, § 12; art. 6, §§ 2, 14; M. S. A. 480.04, 480.05, 486.01 to 486.06, 611.07, 632.01, 640.10, 640.11; In re Petition for Integration of the Bar of Minnesota, 216 Minn. 195 , 12 N. W. (2d) 515 ; State v. Fellows, 98 Minn. 179 , , ; Hunter v. Zenith Dredge Co. 220 Minn. 318 , 19 N. W. (2d) 795 ; Wallace v. Board of Co. Commrs.
In re Smith 19 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1945
In re Smith 19 N.W.2d 324 Minn. 1945
In re Petition for Integration of the Bar, 216 Minn. 195 , 12 N. W. (2d) 515 ; In re Egan, 52 S. D. 891, .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by