Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Petraborg v. Zontelli, 15 N.W.2d 174.

32 citing documents.

Steven Schussler, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Reasonableness “is a question of fact to be determined fro m the circumstances of each case.”
William M. Dunkley, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
When parties own property jointly, “each cotenant has at all times the right to enter upon and enjoy every part of the common estate.”
Save Lake Calhoun, Minn. 2020
See, –83 (Minn. 1944) (“Our North Star state has been c alled the Land of 10,000 Lakes.
In re: Estate of Sandra Sandland, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Neumann v. Anderson 916 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Neumann v. Anderson 916 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Leutgers v. Kasten , 295 Minn. 545 , 546 n.1, , 211 n.1 (1973) ; Swogger , 243 Minn. at 462 n.4, 467 n.15, d at 381 n.3, 384 n.14 ; Petraborg v. Zontelli , 217 Minn. 536 , 540-41, , 177 (1944) ; Murray v. Murray , 159 Minn. 111 , 114, 198 N.W.
State v. Zais 805 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 2011
State v. Spence 768 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 2009
Balasuriya v. Bemel 617 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Balasuriya v. Bemel 617 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
The supreme court has recognized that “each cotenant has at all times the right to enter upon and enjoy every part of the common estate.” Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536, 540
Department of Natural Resources v. Todd County Hearings Unit 356 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Department of Natural Resources v. Todd County Hearings Unit 356 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The lakes themselves were excluded from the acreage purchased, and the law was settled that “meandered lakes belong to the state in its sovereign capacity in trust for the public.” Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536, 552
Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 300 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1980
Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 300 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1980
Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536
County of Hennepin v. Shasky 182 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1970
County of Hennepin v. Shasky 182 N.W.2d 431 Minn. 1970
[Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536 , 15 N. W. (2d) 174 .]
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536 , 15 N. W. (2d) 174 .
Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
Flynn v. Beisel 102 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1960
See, also, Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536 , 15 N. W. (2d) 174 ; Barney v. City of Baltimore (C. C. D. Md.)
Johnson v. Seifert 100 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
Johnson v. Seifert 100 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1960
In Petraborg v. Zon-telli, 217 Minn. 536, 547 , 15 N. W. (2d) 174, 180 , which involved a navigable lake, we said: “As to a public lake, a mutual right of enjoyment exists between and is shared by riparian owners and the public generally.
State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
State v. Adams 89 N.W.2d 661 Minn. 1957
The state also claims that, under the decision of this court in Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536 , 15 N. W. (2d) 174 , the question of navigability and naturalness of the cutaway from Rabbit to Clinker is res adjudicata against the defendants in these actions.
Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
14 Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536 , 15 N. W. (2d) 174 ; 5 Am.
State ex rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. District Court 42 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1950
State ex rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. District Court 42 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1950
Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536 , 15 N. W. (2d) 174 .
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 29 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1947
State v. Longyear Holding Co. 29 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1947
It may be doubtful whether the title does not remain unchanged, and whether if, in the future, it should become necessary for the state to broaden the navigable channel so as to embrace the reclaimed land, it would not have the right to do so.” In Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536, 547 , 15 N. W. (2d) 174, 180 , we defined the rights of riparian owners as follows: «<* * * The extent of the property right is well expressed in Warder v. Springfield [9 Ohio Dec.
In Re Application of Baldwin to Vacate Lake Street 15 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1944
In Re Application of Baldwin to Vacate Lake Street 15 N.W.2d 184 Minn. 1944
Lamprey v. State, 52 Minn. 181 , , 18 L. R. A. 670, 38 A. S. R. 541; Madsen v. Larson, 117 Minn. 369 , ; State v. Korrer, 127 Minn. 60 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 139; Erickschen v. County of Sibley, 142 Minn. 37 , ; In re Petition of Schaller, supra; In re Petition of Krebs, 213 Minn. 344 , 6 N. W. (2d) 803 ; Petraborg v. Zontelli, 217 Minn. 536 , 15 N. W. (2d) 174 .