DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ranum v. Swenson, 19 N.W.2d 327.

105 citing documents.

  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
  • Mayzlik v. Lansing Elevator Co. 63 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1954
    Co. 218 Minn. 532 , 16 N. W. (2d) 758 ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
  • Ryan v. Griffin 62 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1954
  • Ryan v. Griffin 62 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1954
    4 Foster v. Bock, 229 Minn. 428 , 39 N. W. (2d) 862 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Nees v. Minneapolis St.
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
  • Schleuder v. Soltow 59 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1953
    Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
  • Shoop v. Peterson 53 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1952
  • Overruled Shoop v. Peterson 53 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1952
    such cases as Hermanson v. Switzer, 188 Minn. 455 , ; DeHaan v. Wolff, 178 Minn. 426 , ; and Sorenson v. Sander- *64 son, 176 Minn. 299 , , that the driver of a motor vehicle who looks and does not see that which is in plain sight and which he ought to have seen was guilty of negligence as a matter of law, that doctrine was overruled in Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 , and Ahraham v. Byman, 214 Minn. 355 , 8 N. W. (2d) 231 , to the extent that the mere failure on the part of
  • Wiest v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 52 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1952
  • Wiest v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 52 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1952
    Holz v. Pearson, 229 Minn. 395 , 39 N. W. (2d) 867 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Kerzie v. Rodine, 216 Minn. 44 , 11 N. W. (2d) 771 ; Bergstrom v. Frank, 213 Minn. 9 , 4 N. W. (2d) 620 ; Heitman v. City of Lake City, 225 Minn. 117 , 30 N. W. (2d) 18 .
  • Webber v. Seymour 51 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1952
  • Webber v. Seymour 51 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1952
    Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
  • Gilbertson v. Gross 45 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1951
  • Gilbertson v. Gross 45 N.W.2d 547 Minn. 1951
    Flemming v. Thorson, supra; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
  • Schrader v. Kriesel 45 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1950
  • Schrader v. Kriesel 45 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1950
    Co. 218 Minn. 532 , 16 N. W. (2d) 758 ; Jeddeloh v. Hockenhull, 219 Minn. 541 , 18 N. W. (2d) 582 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Montgomery Ward & Co. Inc. v. Snuggins (8 Cir.) 103 F. (2d) 458; see, also, 4 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Rose v. Western States Life Insurance 41 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1950
  • Rose v. Western States Life Insurance 41 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 1950
    Even if we were to hold that these cases are authority for the proposition urged by defendants, since Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 , and Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N. W. (2d) 883 , 175 A. L. R. 1007, they would be inapplicable to the facts we have before us in this case.
  • Holz v. Pearson 39 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1949
  • Holz v. Pearson 39 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1949
    Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Kerzie v. Rodine, 216 Minn. 44 , 11 N. W. (2d) 771 ; Bergstrom v. Frank, 213 Minn. 9 , 4 N. W. (2d) 620 ; Heitman v. City of Lake City, 225 Minn. 117 , 30 N. W. (2d) 18 .
  • State Ex Rel. American Federation, Etc. v. Hanson 38 N.W.2d 845 Minn. 1949
  • Schmoll v. J. W. Craig Co. 37 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1949
  • Schmoll v. J. W. Craig Co. 37 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1949
    Greear v. Paust, 192 Minn. 287 , ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Martin v. Reibel 34 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1948
  • Martin v. Reibel 34 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1948
    Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N. W. (2d) 888 , 175 A. L. R. 1007; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
  • Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
  • Mattfeld v. Nester 32 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1948
    As said in Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170, 175 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 , 330: “* * * ‘In automobile collision cases this court has adopted a policy of hesitation when contributory negligence as a matter of law is attempted to be found on estimates.’ ” The jury’s finding that William was not guilty of contributory negligence is sustained by the evidence.
  • Koenigs v. Thome 31 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1948
  • Koenigs v. Thome 31 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1948
    See, Odegard v. Connolly, 211 Minn. 342 , 1 N. W. (2d) 137 ; Ranum v. Swanson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; 2 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System of Minnesota, Inc. 31 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1948
  • Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System of Minnesota, Inc. 31 N.W.2d 332 Minn. 1948
    Heitman v. City of Lake City, 225 Minn. 117 , 30 N. W. (2d) 18 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Kerzie v. Rodine, 216 Minn. 44 , 11 N. W. (2d) 771 ; Bergstrom v. Frank, 213 Minn. 9 , 4 N. W. (2d) 620 .
  • Kapla v. Lehti 30 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1948
  • Kapla v. Lehti 30 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1948
    Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Schweikert v. Peters Sausage Co. 206 Minn. 596 , ; Kulla v. E. B. Crabtree Co. 203 Minn. 105 , ; Turnmire v. Jefferson Transp.
  • Moore v. Kujath 29 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1947
  • Heitman v. City of Lake City 30 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1947
  • Moore v. Kujath 29 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1947
    Defendant cites Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , , and Abraham v. Byman, 214 Minn. 355 , , as authority for the so-called repudiation .
  • Heitman v. City of Lake City 30 N.W.2d 18 Minn. 1947
    Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Kerzie v. Rodine, 216 Minn. 44 , 11 N. W. (2d) 771 ; Bergstrom v. Frank, 213 Minn. 9 , 4 N. W. (2d) 620 .
  • Sanders v. Gilbertson 29 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1947
  • Sanders v. Gilbertson 29 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1947
    Goldfine v. Johnson, 208 Minn. 449 , ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; Johnson v. Evanski, 221 Minn. 323 , 22 N. W. (2d) 213 .
  • Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'n 28 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1947
  • Eichten Ex Rel. Eichten v. Central Minnesota Cooperative Power Ass'n 28 N.W.2d 862 Minn. 1947
    Kerzie v. Rodine, 216 Minn. 44 , 11 N. W. (2d) 771 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
  • Knox v. Knox 25 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1946
  • Knox v. Knox 25 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1946
    “* * * An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” Kaehler v. Kaehler, 219 Minn. 536 , 18 N. W. (2d) 312 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170, 178 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327, 331 .
  • Anderson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 26 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1946
  • Anderson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 26 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1946
    Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170, 178 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327, 332 ; 5 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Johnson v. Evanski 22 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1946
  • Johnson v. Evanski 22 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1946
    Groldfine v. Johnson, 208 Minn. 449 , ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
  • Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 21 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1946
  • Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 21 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1946
    Co. 214 Minn. 274 , 7 N. W. (2d) 926 ; Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 ; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Meiners v. Kennedy 20 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1945