Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ranum v. Swenson, 19 N.W.2d 327.

105 citing documents.

Meiners v. Kennedy 20 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1945
53 , , we held: “On appeal from a judgment after trial by the court, no motion for a new trial having been made and no errors in rulings or proceedings at the trial being involved, the questions for review are limited to a consideration of whether the evidence sustains the findings of fact and whether such findings sustain the conclusions of law and judgment.” Cf. Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327, 332 ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Wendelsdorf v. County of Martin 20 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1945
Wendelsdorf v. County of Martin 20 N.W.2d 528 Minn. 1945
See, also, Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .
Medved v. Doolittle 19 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1945
Medved v. Doolittle 19 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1945
Ranum v. Swenson, 220 Minn. 170 , 19 N. W. (2d) 327 .