Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Trust Under Will of Cosgrave, 31 N.W.2d 20.

25 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Estate of: Mathew Joseph Tomczik, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“[I]ntention which the testator may have had, but did not express in his will, cannot be considered.” In re Cosgrave’s Will
In re the Estate of: Shirley Joy Pratt, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Second, Deanne cites In re Cosgrave’s Will for the proposition that a court “cannot change the rights of the beneficiaries inter se by enlarging the rights of some at the expense of others.”
In re the Estate of: Edward D. Kane a/k/a Edward Donald Kane, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Conversely, intention which the testator may have had, but did not express in his will, cannot be considered.” 225 Minn. 443, 448–49, (citations omitted).
In Re Ruth Easton Fund 680 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re Ruth Easton Fund 680 N.W.2d 541 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Just as the court lacks power to remake a will, it also lacks the power to remake a trust.” Northwestern Nat’l Bank of Minneapolis v. Balch (In re Cosgrave’s Will), 225 Minn. 443, 466
In Re the Estate of Lund 633 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re the Estate of Lund 633 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Cf. In re Cosgrave’s Will, 225 Minn. 443, 458 , (finding no demonstrative legacy because there was no specified sum of money, the gift was “not to be paid at all events,” and only to be paid out one source).
In Re Estate of Kerr 520 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In Re Estate of Kerr 520 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
at 484 ; see In re Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443, 449 , (intention which testator did not express in his will cannot be considered).
In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright 359 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Trust Established Under Trust Agreement of Boright 359 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re Cosgrave’s Will, 225 Minn. 443, 449
Matter of Wiedemann 358 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Matter of Wiedemann 358 N.W.2d 139 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In re Cosgrave's Will, 225 Minn. 443, 449
In Re the Trusts Created in & by the Last Will & Testament of HARTMAN 347 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1984
In Re the Trusts Created in & by the Last Will & Testament of HARTMAN 347 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1984
* * * Conversely, intention which the testator may have had, but did not express in his will, cannot be considered.” In re Cosgrave’s Will, 225 Minn. 443, 448-49
Matter of Will of Kelly 266 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1978
Matter of Will of Kelly 266 N.W.2d 700 Minn. 1978
See, In re Trust under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443
In Matter of Campbell's Trusts 258 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1977
In Matter of Campbell's Trusts 258 N.W.2d 856 Minn. 1977
In re Trust Under Will of Cosgrave, 225 Minn. 443
In Re Trust Under Agreement With Nash 122 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1963
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Whelan 263 Minn. 476 Minn. 1962
First National Bank v. Stewart 116 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1962
In Re Petition of Parks 114 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1962
In Re Trust Created by Will of Tuthill 247 Minn. 122 Minn. 1956
Bickford v. Wicklow 76 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 1956