Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bellows v. Ericson, 46 N.W.2d 654.

46 citing documents.

Pioneer Bank v. Might Enterprises, Inc., et al., The 209 Group, LLC, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The status quo is the “last actual, peaceable, noncontested status which preceded the pending controversy.” n.9 (Minn. 1951).
Ellie Fam LLC v. Felipe Coelho, et al. (A25-1515), Ellie Fam LLC, vs. Jim Baffone, et al. (A25-1517), … Minn. Ct. App. 2026
The status quo is the “last actual, peaceable, noncontested status which preceded the pending controversy.” n.9 (Minn. 1951).
In the Matter of the Trust Created Under Agreement by and Between Janet E. Johnson, Settlor, and Paul … Minn. 2025
In the Matter of the Trust Created Under Agreement by and Between Janet E. Johnson, Settlor, and Paul … Minn. 2025
(emphasis added) (–59 (Minn. 1951)).
In re the Estate of: Joseph Rocco Figliuzzi Minn. 2022
In re the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
Cox v. Mid-Minnesota Mut. Ins. Co. 909 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 2018
See, e.g. , Bellows v. Ericson , 233 Minn. 320 , , 656 (1951) ("The original action ...
Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc. 900 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 2017
Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc. 900 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 2017
See Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , (issuing a writ of prohibition to prevent a court from enforcing its order).
Minn. 2017
(issuing a writ of prohibition to prevent a court from enforcing its order).
State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 799 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners 799 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Interest Research Group, d at 783 , or an affirmative injunction, “which commands the doing of some positive act by the defendant,” see, e.g., Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320, 325-26
Custody of A.V.A. v. Ratchaneewan 683 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Custody of A.V.A. v. Ratchaneewan 683 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320, 325
El Nashaar v. El Nashaar 529 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
El Nashaar v. El Nashaar 529 N.W.2d 13 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320, 325 , (prohibition does not lie where appeal affords adequate remedy); (order assuming jurisdiction under the UCCJA is appealable).
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Itasca Co. 403 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Itasca Co. 403 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320, 325-26
Hideaway, Inc. v. Gambit Investments, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hideaway, Inc. v. Gambit Investments, Inc. 386 N.W.2d 822 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320, 326-26
Liptak v. State Ex Rel. City of New Hope 340 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. Weisman 340 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Hancock-Nelson Mercantile Co. v. Weisman 340 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
State v. Hartman, 261 Minn. 314 , Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , Nemo v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees’ Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263
Liptak v. State Ex Rel. City of New Hope 340 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
State v. Hartman, 261 Minn. 314 , Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , Nemo v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees' Local No. 556, 227 Minn. 263
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314 233 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1975
Larson v. Independent School District No. 314 233 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1975
1 The use of the writ of prohibition for obtaining review of certain interlocutory orders is approved in Ginsberg v. Williams, 270 Minn. 474 , and Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320
Petition of Giblin 232 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1975
Petition of Giblin 232 N.W.2d 214 Minn. 1975
Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320
Wasmund v. Nunamaker 151 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1967
Wasmund v. Nunamaker 151 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 1967
1 See, Weidel v. Plummer, 243 Minn. 476 , 68 N. W. (2d) 245 ; Craigmile v. Sorenson, 241 Minn. 222 , 62 N. W. (2d) 846 ; Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , 46 N. W. (2d) 654 ; Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 ; State ex rel.
Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company 137 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1965
Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company 137 N.W.2d 314 Minn. 1965
11 See, Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , 46 N. W. (2d) 654 ; Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Chicago Great Western R. Co. (8 Cir.) 190 F. (2d) 361; Northern States Power Co. v. City of St.
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 115 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1962
Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington 115 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1962
Paragraph (2) thereof provides that such appeal may be taken “[f]rom an order * * * which grants, refuses, dissolves, or refuses to dissolve, an injunction * * Under this section it is clear that an order granting or refusing to dissolve a temporary injunction is appealable, Fuller v. Schutz, 88 Minn. 372 , ; Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , 46 N. W. (2d) 654 ; although where such an order has been made ex parte the right to appeal therefrom has been denied upon the principle that this court
In Re Petition of Parks 114 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1962
In Re Petition of Parks 114 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1962
2 Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320, 324 , 46 N. W. (2d) 654, 658 .
Gram v. Village of Shoreview 106 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1960
Gram v. Village of Shoreview 106 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1960
Co. 169 Minn. 15 , , ; Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , 46 N. W. (2d) 654 .
Marine v. Whipple 104 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1960
Northwest Hotel Corp. v. Henderson 100 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1959
Northwest Hotel Corp. v. Henderson 100 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1959
such discretion must be exercised with a view to protect the one enjoined against the probable loss that he may sustain, if it be finally determined that the injunction should not have issued.” This statement was quoted with apparent approval, although by way of dicta, in Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , 46 N. W. (2d) 654 .
State Ex Rel. Sheehan v. District Court 93 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1958
State Ex Rel. Sheehan v. District Court 93 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1958
See, Weidel v. Plummer, 243 Minn. 476 , 68 N. W. (2d) 245 ; Craigmile v. Sorenson, 241 Minn. 222 , 62 N. W. (2d) 846 ; Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , 46 N. W. (2d) 654 ; Nemo v. Local Joint Executive Board, 227 Minn. 263 , 35 N. W. (2d) 337, 811 ; State ex rel.
Craigmile v. Sorenson 62 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1954
Distinguished Craigmile v. Sorenson 62 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1954
(Bellows v. Ericson, 233 Minn. 320 , 46 N. W. [2d] 654, is distinguishable in that no bond whatsoever was furnished therein, and preliminary to the application for the writ, a motion to vacate the district court order had been made and denied.)