Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 58 N.W.2d 247.

46 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Amanda Leigh Davis Floyd, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
EDF-RE US Development, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In support of its argument
George Hadrich, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee , (determining that $100 was adequate consideration when it was paid for the option even though it was to be applied to the purchase price) .
In re the Marriage of: Brad Allen Friesz, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee
James Russell, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee , d 247, 249 (Minn. 1953).
In re the Marriage of: Linsey Lee Milbrandt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Scott Jovaag, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee
Ashlee Kay Sames, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-51 (Minn. 1953) (stating that, because “[i]t is the function of this court to re view the judicial acts of the trial court and not its judicial opinions,” if the defendant was entitled to 16 judgment as a matter of law “for any reason, the trial court must be sustained even though it announced a different
Waseca County v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Waseca County v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[Appellate courts] construe a contract as a whole and attempt to harmonize all clauses of the contract.” Chergosky, d at 525; see also Burgi, d at 518 (“Terms in a contract should be read together and harmonized where possible.” (citing Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151–52, )).
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 790 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2010
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 790 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2010
See Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151-52
Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 706 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 706 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Thus, tender need not be made when the failure to tender is justified or when the tender would be an “idle ceremony.” Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 155 , (holding that plaintiffs failure to make tender of price specified in option contract was excused by defendant’s repudiation of contract and refusal to go through with transaction because tender would have been futile and useless); Morgan v. Ibberson, 215 Minn. 293, 295
Smith v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 656 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Smith v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 656 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Concepts, Inc. v. Irie Enters., Inc., (citation omitted); see also Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151-2 , (stating that “[a]s far as is reasonably possible [a contract] is to be construed so as to harmonize all of its parts”).
Nimis v. St. Paul Turners 521 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Nimis v. St. Paul Turners 521 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151 , (contract read as a whole).
Nichols v. Metropolitan Bank 468 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Nichols v. Metropolitan Bank 468 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co. 441 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1989
Levin v. C.O.M.B. Co. 441 N.W.2d 801 Minn. 1989
See also Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 154
Johnson Bros. Corp. v. Rapidan Redevelopment Ltd. Partnership 423 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson Bros. Corp. v. Rapidan Redevelopment Ltd. Partnership 423 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151-52
American Warehousing & Distributing, Inc. v. Michael Ede Management, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
American Warehousing & Distributing, Inc. v. Michael Ede Management, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 554 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Telex Corp. v. Data Products Corp., 271 Minn. 288, 293 , (quoting Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151-52 , ).
Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp. 415 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp. 415 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Cement, Sand & Gravel Co., 225 Minn. at 216 , d at 345 ; see also Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151-52
Boe v. Christlieb 399 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Boe v. Christlieb 399 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151
Burgi v. Eckes 354 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Burgi v. Eckes 354 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151-2 , n. 2 (Minn.1977) (contracts in several writings construed with reference to each other).
Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Marquette Bank & Trust Co. of Rochester 295 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1980
Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. Marquette Bank & Trust Co. of Rochester 295 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1980
Desnick v. Mast, 311 Minn. 356, 365 , Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 154
Desnick v. Mast 249 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1976
Desnick v. Mast 249 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 1976
Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 154
Minnesota Ltd., Inc. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N OF HIBBING 208 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1973
Minnesota Ltd., Inc. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N OF HIBBING 208 N.W.2d 284 Minn. 1973
Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148
Brachmann v. Netzinger 196 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1972
Brachmann v. Netzinger 196 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1972
See, Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148
Blackduck State Bank v. Wickham 158 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1968
Blackduck State Bank v. Wickham 158 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1968
In Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148, 151 , 58 N. W. (2d) 247, 249 , this court held: “The rule is well settled that in a civil action where the appellant makes no assignments of error in this court no question is presented to it for review; but notwithstanding the rule, if respondent voluntarily joins in arguing a question argued by appellant, this cour
Koch v. Han-Shire Investments, Inc. 140 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1966
Koch v. Han-Shire Investments, Inc. 140 N.W.2d 55 Minn. 1966
Corp. v. Morse, 261 Minn. 259 , 111 N. W. (2d) 620 ; Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148 , 58 N. W. (2d) 247 .
Telex Corporation v. Data Products Corporation 135 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1965
Telex Corporation v. Data Products Corporation 135 N.W.2d 681 Minn. 1965
Whether or not this agreement is regarded as a form of option contract, we think the decision of this court in Country Club Oil Co. v. Lee, 239 Minn. 148 , 58 N. W. (2d) 247 , cited by Data and also by the trial court in its memorandum, sets forth the approach to be followed in the construction of the terms of the agreement ( 239 Minn. 151 , 58 N. W. [2d] 249): “It is an elementary principle of law that a contract must be construed as a whole.