Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Gardner v. Holm, 62 N.W.2d 52.

32 citing documents.

Jeffrey S. Sheridan, et al., Minn. 2021
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125 , (“[W]here the language used is clear, explicit, and unambiguous ...
Honorable Galen J. Vaa, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125, 129, (stating that “the language of the [clause] itself is the best evidence of the intention of the framers of the constitution”)).
City of Golden Valley v. Wiebesick 899 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2017
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem 891 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125, 129
Schowalter v. State 822 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 2012
Schowalter v. State 822 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 2012
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125, 129 , (stating that “the language of the provision itself is the best evidence of the intention of the framers of the constitution”).
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co. 758 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co. 758 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125, 129 , (quoting Minn. & Pac.
State v. Hartmann 700 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2005
State v. Hartmann 700 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2005
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn: 125, 129
Diemer v. Carlson 550 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1996
Diemer v. Carlson 550 N.W.2d 875 Minn. 1996
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125, 129 , ).
Page v. Carlson 488 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1992
Page v. Carlson 488 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1992
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125, 129 , ).
Rice v. Connolly 488 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1992
Rice v. Connolly 488 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1992
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125
Inter Faculty Organization v. Carlson 478 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1991
Inter Faculty Organization v. Carlson 478 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1991
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125
Fassbinder v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'n 254 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1977
Fassbinder v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'n 254 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1977
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125
Peterson v. Knutson 233 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1975
Peterson v. Knutson 233 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1975
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125 , Payne v. Lee, 222 Minn. 269
State v. Hoppe 215 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1974
State v. Hoppe 215 N.W.2d 797 Minn. 1974
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125, 129 , we said that the language of a constitutional provision, “when * * * clear, explicit, unambiguous, and free from obscurity,” is the best evidence of the underlying intent.
Green's Bar Incorporated v. Johnson 147 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1967
Green's Bar Incorporated v. Johnson 147 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1967
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125 , 62 N. W. (2d) 52 , cited by the parties, are not useful as precedents here.
Duxbury v. Donovan 138 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1965
Duxbury v. Donovan 138 N.W.2d 692 Minn. 1965
Gardner v. Holm, 241 Minn. 125, 140 , 62 N. W. (2d) 52, 62 , we said in this connection: “* * * At the time our United States.