Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Carpenter v. Nelson, 101 N.W.2d 918.

80 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The highest requirement of proof is in criminal cases where the guilt of the defendant must be established ‘beyond a reasonable doubt.’” n.3 (Minn. 1960).
The CastleRock Group, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 918, 921 ( Minn. 1960).
Deondra Warren, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The claimant bears the burden of proving the essential elements of a claim “by a fair preponderance of the evidence.”
A21-1320 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
As plaintiff, Wayne bore the burd en of proving his claim by a preponderance of the evidence.12
Francis J. Schumacher, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Appellants bear the burden of proving the essential elements of a breach-of-contract claim “by a fair preponderance of the evidence.” d 828, 833 (Minn. 2011) (articulating breach-of-contract factors).
Ren Xu, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
North Country Tire and Auto, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The claimant bears the burden of proving the essential elements of a claim “by a fair preponderance of the evidence.”
Busad Kheyre, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Fair preponderan ce of the evidence is evidence offered to prove a given fact that “fairly outweigh[s] the evidence offered in opposition to it and be of greater convincing force and effect.” Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427
Victoria L. Sloan v. Kelly O'Neil, Regina Sabbia, Kerrie Cathcart, Uptown Realty & Management, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Victoria L. Sloan v. Kelly O'Neil, Regina Sabbia, Kerrie Cathcart, Uptown Realty & Management, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427, (stating that, “[i]n the ordinary civil action, .
Mark Sharockman v. LifeSpan of Minnesota, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Sharockman v. LifeSpan of Minnesota, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427, d 918, 921 (1960) (“In the ordinary civil action, .
Alan Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc., Cirrus Holding Company, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Alan Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc., Cirrus Holding Company, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 428, (stating that it is “well established” that damages that are “remote, conjectural, or speculative” may not be recovered); see also Prince, 34 Minn. 71, 77, 24 N.W.
David Dennis Schroer v. Thomas Redmond Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David Dennis Schroer v. Thomas Redmond Minn. Ct. App. 2015
4 The plaintiff bears the burden of proving the essential elements of the claim “by a fair preponderance of the evidence.” Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427, d 918, 921 (1960).
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 836 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2013
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 836 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2013
See Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427
Rixmann v. City of Prior Lake 723 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rixmann v. City of Prior Lake 723 N.W.2d 493 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427 , rev’d on other grounds
Jensen v. Duluth Area YMCA 688 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Jensen v. Duluth Area YMCA 688 N.W.2d 574 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
“[T]here can be no recovery for damages which are remote, conjectural, or speculative.” Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 428
Thompson v. Hughart 664 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Thompson v. Hughart 664 N.W.2d 372 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
See Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427
Simpson v. American Family Insurance Co. 603 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Simpson v. American Family Insurance Co. 603 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427
Bryson v. Pillsbury Co. 573 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Bryson v. Pillsbury Co. 573 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427
Canada by and Through Landy v. McCarthy 567 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1997
Canada by and Through Landy v. McCarthy 567 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1997
See Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427
Zawels v. Edutronics, Inc. 520 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Zawels v. Edutronics, Inc. 520 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424 , 427 (in ordinary civil action plaintiff has burden of proving every essential element of case, including damages, by fair preponderance of evidence).
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Petition of Northern States Power Co. 402 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Trimbo v. Minnesota Valley Natural Gas Co., 260 Minn. 386, 398 , cf. Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427
Kwapien v. Starr 400 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Kwapien v. Starr 400 N.W.2d 179 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 427
Yule v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. 390 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Yule v. Iowa National Mutual Insurance Co. 390 N.W.2d 391 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 428
Krueger v. Nordstrom 367 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Krueger v. Nordstrom 367 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424
Clemas v. Northern States Enterprises, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Clemas v. Northern States Enterprises, Inc. 361 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424, 428 , Landeen v. DeJung, 219 Minn. 287, 293
Pietrzak v. Eggen 295 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1980
Pietrzak v. Eggen 295 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1980
Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424 , Dornberg v. St.
Duchene v. Wolstan 258 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1977
Duchene v. Wolstan 258 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 1977
See, also, Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424
Dunshee v. Douglas 255 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1977
Dunshee v. Douglas 255 N.W.2d 42 Minn. 1977
Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424 , 101 N,W.2d 918 (1960).
Jackson v. Reiling 249 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1977
Jackson v. Reiling 249 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1977
Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill Noyes v. Lazere, 301 Minn. 462 , Carpenter v. Nelson, 257 Minn. 424