Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Erickson v. SUNSET MEMORIAL PARK ASSN., INC., 108 N.W.2d 434.

33 citing documents.

State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, et al., Minn. 2021
We construe statutes, where reasonably possible, “to avoid irreconcilable difference and conflict with another statute.” Erickson v. Sunset Mem’l Park Ass’n
Kristina Greene, et al., Minn. 2020
See Erickson v. Sunset Mem’l Park Ass’n, (stating that when “reasonably possible” we interpret a statute to avoid conflict with other statutes).
Minn. 2019
See Erickson v. Sunset Mem’l Park Ass’n, ( stating that where “reasonably possible” we interpret a statute to avoid conflict with other statute s).
Allan Fishel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The general terms of a statute are subject to implied exception s founded on rules of public policy and the maxims of natural justice so as to avoid absurd and unjust consequences.” Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Ass’n, 259 Minn. 532, 543
State v. Peck 773 N.W.2d 768 Minn. 2009
State v. Cottew 746 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 2008
State v. Cottew 746 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 2008
No. 624, Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Ass’n, 259 Minn. 532, 543
Minnesota Equal Access Network Services v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Means v. BURLINGTON NO. & SANTA FE R. CO. 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Means v. BURLINGTON NO. & SANTA FE R. CO. 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Erickson v. Sunset Mem'l Park Ass'n, 259 Minn. 532, 543
Minnesota Equal Access Network Services v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railroad 646 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See Erickson v. Sunset Mem’l Park Ass’n, 259 Minn. 532, 543
Hince v. O'KEEFE 632 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2001
Hince v. O'KEEFE 632 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2001
Erickson v. Sunset Mem’l Park Ass’n, 259 Minn. 532, 543
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 632 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
Astleford Equipment Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp. 632 N.W.2d 182 Minn. 2001
See Erickson v. Sunset Mem’l Park Ass’n, 259 Minn. 532, 543
American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl 616 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 2000
American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl 616 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 2000
See Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc., 254 Minn. 62, 73-74 , see also Erickson *278 v. Sunset Mem’l Park Ass’n, 259 Minn. 532, 543
Baker v. Ploetz 616 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2000
Baker v. Ploetz 616 N.W.2d 263 Minn. 2000
See Erickson v. Sunset Mem’l Park Ass’n, 259 Minn. 532, 543
Hampton Bank v. River City Yachts, Inc. 528 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hampton Bank v. River City Yachts, Inc. 528 N.W.2d 880 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(citing Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Ass'n, 259 Minn. 532, 543 , ), aff'd
Miller v. Colortyme, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1994
Miller v. Colortyme, Inc. 518 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1994
Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Assoc., 259 Minn. 532, 543
D.W.H. Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Steele 494 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
D.W.H. Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Steele 494 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Assoc., 259 Minn. 532, 543
State v. Olson 325 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
State v. Olson 325 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1982
179 , 74 S.E.2d 749, 755 (1953); see also Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Association, 259 Minn. 532, 543 , wherein this court construed a statute as impliedly excepting religious and fraternal cemeteries from the anti-discrimination provisions of the statute in order to keep it within the First Amendment.
Coon Creek Watershed District v. State Environmental Quality Board 315 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1982
Coon Creek Watershed District v. State Environmental Quality Board 315 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1982
See Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Ass’n, 259 Minn. 532 , (statutes should be reconciled with EPA as to any apparent conflict).
People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council 266 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
People for Environmental Enlightenment & Responsibility (PEER), Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality Council 266 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1978
Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Assn., 259 Minn. 532, 543 , Minneapolis Eastern Railway Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 247 Minn. 413, 418
Besch v. Village of Arden Hills 115 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1962
Besch v. Village of Arden Hills 115 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1962
§§ 645.16, 645.17; Erickson v. Sunset Memorial Park Assn. Inc. 259 Minn. 532 , 108 N. W. (2d) 434 ; Wichelman v. Messner, 250 Minn. 88 , 83 N. W. (2d) 800 , 71 A. L. R. (2d) 816.