Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Village of Edina v. Joseph, 119 N.W.2d 809.

84 citing documents.

A19-1878 Minn. 2021
of Edina v. Joseph , d 809, 816 (Minn. 1962) (explaining that appeals from tax assessments, “their course, and the time and manner in which they are to be allowed and perfected are of statutory origin”).
Gust G. Johanson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In its previous order, the district court stated a declaratory judgment is an equitable remedy, and an invalid one , citing to Village of Edina v. Joseph, which held “relief against erroneous or illegal assessments will not be granted by a court of equity, if the property owner has an adequate remedy at law.” 264 Minn. 84, 100
CLino LLC v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gerald L. Rehbein v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gerald L. Rehbein v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 87, 102, 820-21 (1962) (affirming assessment for street improvements along one of city’s “main .
CLino LLC v. City of Lino Lakes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 86-88, (affirming assessment for street improvements along one of city’s “main .
Archie J. Pavek, Trustee of the Archie J. Pavek Revocable Trust v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Archie J. Pavek, Trustee of the Archie J. Pavek Revocable Trust v. City of Prior Lake Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 95
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc. 868 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc. 868 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93
In Re Stadsvold 754 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 2008
In Re Stadsvold 754 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 2008
of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93 , ).
Cederberg v. City of Inver Grove Heights 686 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Cederberg v. City of Inver Grove Heights 686 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Wessen v. Village of Deephaven, 284 Minn. 296, 298 , Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93-94
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
Prior Lake American v. Mader 642 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2002
In Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93 , we stated: We have repeatedly said with respect to the decisions of municipal and other governmental bodies having the duty of making decisions involving judgment and discretion that it is not the province of the court to substitute its judgment for that of the body making such a deci
Buss v. Johnson 624 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Buss v. Johnson 624 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93 , (citations omitted).
Bisbee v. City of Fairmont 593 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Bisbee v. City of Fairmont 593 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Wessen v. Village of Deephaven, 284 Minn. 296 , Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 94
Buzick v. City of Blaine 491 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Buzick v. City of Blaine 491 N.W.2d 923 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
The law requires only that assessments be “roughly proportionate to the benefits accruing.” (citing Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 97 , ).
DeSutter v. Township of Helena 489 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
DeSutter v. Township of Helena 489 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
see also, Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 102 , (assessment affirmed where record did not establish it was “without integrity and faithful consideration by the municipal authorities or that it resulted from the adoption of inapplicable rules of law”).
M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue 470 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
M.A. Mortenson Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue 470 N.W.2d 126 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
This principle was succinctly explained in Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 100 , where the Minnesota Supreme Court stated: The authorities generally indicate that relief against erroneous or illegal assessments will not be granted by a court of equity, if the property owner has an adequate remedy at law.
Blankenburg v. City of Northfield 462 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Blankenburg v. City of Northfield 462 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 95
In re the Appeal of Brine 457 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In re the Appeal of Brine 457 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93
Preserve Ass'n v. City of Eden Prairie 421 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Preserve Ass'n v. City of Eden Prairie 421 N.W.2d 419 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
[I]n determining whether an improvement does benefit property in the assessment district, the land should be considered simply in its general relations, and apart from its particular use at the time, * * * Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 98 , -19 (1962).
Shortridge v. Daubney 400 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Shortridge v. Daubney 400 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Id.; Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93
Lunderberg v. City of St. Peter 398 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lunderberg v. City of St. Peter 398 N.W.2d 579 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Further, “the market value may be calculated on the highest and best use of the land.” Anderson, d at 560 ; Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 99 , (value enhanced for any purpose).
Anderson v. City of Bemidji 295 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1980
Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville 295 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1980
Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of Roseville 295 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1980
We stated in Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of Bloomington, 267 Minn. 221, 226 , that “[i]f the reasonableness of the action of the city council is at least doubtful, or fairly debata *608 ble, a court will not interject its own conclusions as to more preferable actions.” In Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93 , quoted in Arcadia, we stated: We have repeatedly said with respect to the decisions of municipal and other governmental bodies having the duty of making decisions involving j
Anderson v. City of Bemidji 295 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1980
Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 97 , In re Improvement of Third Street, 185 Minn. 170, 178 , 240 N.W.
Appeal of Ewert v. City of Winthrop 278 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1979
Appeal of Ewert v. City of Winthrop 278 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1979
See, Wessen v. Village of Deephaven, 284 Minn. 296, 298 , Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 93
Southview Country Club v. City of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County 263 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1978
Southview Country Club v. City of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County 263 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1978
Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 95
Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn Park 256 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1977
Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of Stuntz 257 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1977
Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of Stuntz 257 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1977
c. 555), known as the uniform declaratory judgments act, is not available to the dairy company as an alternative remedy.” This principle was restated by the court in Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84, 94, note 5 , where taxpayers challenged a special assessment under § 429.081: “This court held in Rosso v. Village of Brooklyn Center * * * that the statute allowing direct appeals to district court to attack general assessments or the proceedings in connection therewith [§ 278.01] applies
Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn Park 256 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1977
See, Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84
Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville 245 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc. v. Village of Burnsville 245 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1976
If the special benefits to property so locally affected are equal to the cost of the work, then an amount not exceeding the whole cost may be assessed upon such property; but if the expense thereof exceed such benefits, then the city at large should in any event bear a portion of the burden.” Most recently, in Village of Edina v. Joseph, 264 Minn. 84 , Edina levied assessments on property abutting France Avenue in order to pay for the improvement of that avenue.