Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gannons Inc., 145 N.W.2d 321.

33 citing documents.

Cup Foods, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
This access right is “a property right in the nature of an easement.” State by Mondale v. Gannons, Inc.
CBS MN Properties, LLC v. County of Hennepin Minn. Ct. App. 2024
that the measure of damages for an interference with the right of access to a highway is “the diminution in the market value of the property” as measured by “the difference between the market value of the property before and after suitable access has been denied.” Beer v. Minn. Power & Light Co., (quotation omitted)
Hader Properties, LLC, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This “property right” is “in the nature of an easement.”
In the Matter of: Petition to Vacate Town Road, Kenneth Kuk, et al., Appellants, Joseph VanKeulen Revocable Living … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A right to reasonable access is “a property right in the nature of an easement.”
Cannon Falls Mall Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This right is “a property right in the nature of an easement.”
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Mondale v. Gannons Inc ., which noted that “the law presumes that [interest] will not be included in the award.”
Cannon Falls Oil Company, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
This access right is “a property right in the nature of an easement.” State by Mondale v. Gannons, Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 24
Loren K. Yarmon v. Minnesota Department of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
at 50 (citing State by Mondale v. Gannons, Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 19, ).
Kjellbergs, Inc. v. State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation Minn. Ct. App. 2016
The supreme court, relying on the trilogy of Hendrickson, 267 Minn. at 436, d at 165, State by Mondale v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14, rejected Dale Properties’ arguments.
Robert W. Weckman v. County of Scott Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Corp., d at 334 (quoting State by Mondale v. Gannons, Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 23, ).
Housing & Redevelopment Authority of St. Paul v. Lambrecht 645 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
“Interest on awards in eminent domain proceedings is entirely controlled by statute.” State by Mondale v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 25 , (applying predecessor stat *164 ute).
Dale Properties, LLC v. State 638 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 2002
Mondale v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14 , and, most recently, Blaine Building Corp., d at 331 .
Dale Properties, LLC v. State 619 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State by Mondale v. Gannons, Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 20 , -27 (1966).
Grossman Investments v. State Ex Rel. Humphrey 571 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
This right of access is “a property right in the nature of an easement.” State by Mondale v. Gannons, Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 24
County of Anoka v. Blaine Building Corp. 566 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1997
See also State by Mondale v. Gannons, Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 19 , Hendrickson, 267 Minn. at 445-46 , d at 172-73 .
County of Anoka v. Maego, Inc. 541 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 19-21 , -27 (1966); see also Benson Hotel Corp. v. City of Minneapolis, 290 Minn. 14, 22 , (city may convert two-way street into one-way without compensating abutting property owners); (damages proper becau
County of Anoka v. Esmailzadeh 498 N.W.2d 58 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
3 See State, by Mondale v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 23 , (“the dividing of a roadway by [a median] cannot be made the subject of compensation in condemnation”).
MCC INVESTMENTS v. Crystal Properties 451 N.W.2d 243 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 19
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See, e.g., State v. Gannons, Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 16, (abutting property on street with 200-foot-wide right of way and traveled surface 85 feet wide); Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 437 , (property abutted right of way but was located 85 feet from traveled portion of highway).
Bulletin Publishing Corp. v. City of Cottage Grove 379 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 445-46 , -73 (1964) (footnotes omitted); see State v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14
City of Prior Lake v. Ballard 375 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. North Star Concrete Co., 265 Minn. 483, 488-89 , State v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 18 , -26 (1966).
City of St. Louis Park v. Almor Co. 313 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1981
Further, the City argues that such evidence is admissible if it “legitimately bears on the market value of the [taken] property,” State v. Gannons, Inc., 275 Minn. 14, 18
City of St. Paul v. Rein Recreation, Inc. 298 N.W.2d 46 Minn. 1980
See State v. Gannons, Inc., 275 Minn. 14
Johnson v. City of Plymouth 263 N.W.2d 603 Minn. 1978
See, Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 446 , , *606 173 (1964); State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc., 275 Minn. 14 , State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc., 285 Minn. 1 , Johnson Bros. Grocery v. State, Dept. of Highways, 304 Minn. 75
Larson v. Midland Cooperatives, Inc. 232 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
Defendant finally asserts that the damages were excessive, relying upon this court’s reasoning in State v. Gannons, 275 Minn. 14 , to the effect that where the foundation for qualifying an expert is unreliable, the opinion is unsound, and a verdict based on it cannot stand.
Johnson Bros. Grocery, Inc. v. State, Department of Highways 229 N.W.2d 504 Minn. 1975
See, also, State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , Note, 49 Minn. L. Rev. 93 , 198.
Recke v. State 215 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1974
State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , Gibson v. Commissioner of Highways, 287 Minn. 495
Frantz v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS OF ANOKA COUNTY 210 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1973
State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc. 275 Minn. 14
Schmidt v. Village of Mapleview 196 N.W.2d 626 Minn. 1972
See, State, by Mattson, v. Prow’s Motel, Inc. 285 Minn. 1 , State, by Mondale, v. Gannons, Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436
Gibson v. Commissioner of Highways 178 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1970
See, Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436, 442 , 127 N. W. *500 (2d) 165, 170; State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc. 275 Minn. 14, 22 , 145 N. W. (2d) 321, 328 .
State v. Prow's Motel, Inc. 171 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1969
Minn. Const. art. 1, § 13; State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , 145 N. W. (2d) 321 ; Hendrickson v. State, supra.
State v. Gannons Inc. 145 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1966
State v. Larsen 145 N.W.2d 430 Minn. 1966
See, State, by Mondale, v. Gannons Inc. 275 Minn. 14 , 145 N. W. (2d) 321 ; State, by Lord, v. Kohler, 268 Minn. 77 , 128 N. W. (2d) 90 ; Hendrickson v. State, 267 Minn. 436 , 127 N. W. (2d) 165 .