Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bailey, 132 N.W.2d 720.

19 citing documents.

Chad Alan Hoflock, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The Minnesota Supreme Court has determined that “misleading advice by counsel to his client is not [a] ground for relief, unless it clearly rises to the level of unprofessional conduct.” (quotation omitted).
Isaac Alonzo Cryer, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(“Mere improvident strategy, bad tactics, mistake, carelessness, or inexperience do not necessarily amount to ineffective assistance of counsel unless taken as a whole the trial was a mockery of justice.” (quotation omitted) ); Yarborough v. Gentry, 540 U.S. 1, 6 (2003) (“[E]ven if an omission
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Decisions about objections are matters of trial strategy that we will not second-guess on appeal “unless taken as a whole the trial was a mockery of justice.” State 10 v. Bailey
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Dana John Thompson. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An attorney’s performance does not need to be perfect, it must only be “reasonable[] under prevailing professional norms.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688; -25 (Minn. 1965) (quoting United States ex rel.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Mere improvident strategy, bad tactics, mistake, carelessness, or inexperience do not necessarily amount to ineffective assistance of counsel unless taken as a whole the trial was a mockery of justice.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Counsel’s performance need not be perfect, but “simply reasonable[] under prevailing professional norms.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688; -25 (Minn. 1965) (quoting U.S. ex rel.
Mitchell Le Dac Ho, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Steven Lynn Oppel v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Bailey, 270 Minn. 64, 70, (stating rule that “improvident strategy, bad tactics, mistake, carelessness, or inexperience do not necessarily amount to ineffective assistance of counsel unless taken as a whole the trial was a mockery of justice”) (quotation omitted).
State v. Keenan 184 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1971
State v. Keenan 184 N.W.2d 410 Minn. 1971
In State v. Bailey, 270 Minn. 64 , 132 N. W. (2d) 720 , defendant was convicted of grand larceny and appealed to this court from the judgment, alleging that he was deprived of a fair trial because his attorney had no previous trial experience in criminal cases and failed to object when the prosecution sought to impeach one of its own witnesses.
STATE EX REL. BEACH v. Tahash 161 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1968
STATE EX REL. BEACH v. Tahash 161 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 1968
You were sentenced last week and you are sentenced this week.” 1 The test of inadequacy of counsel, as a constitutional consideration, is whether the quality of the representation is so palpably incompetent as to make “a farce and a mockery of justice.” See, State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57, 69 , 139 N. W. (2d) 785, 794 ; see, also, State v. Bailey, *322 270 Minn. 64 , 132 N. W. (2d) 720 .
State v. Witte 158 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1968
State v. Witte 158 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1968
State v. Bailey, 270 Minn. 64 , 132 N. W. (2d) 720 ; State v. Waldron, 273 Minn. 57 , 139 N. W. (2d) 785 .
State v. Schumann 157 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1968
State v. Schumann 157 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1968
(2d) 785 ; State v. Bailey, 270 Minn. 64 , 132 N. W. (2d) 720 ; 5B Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
Even misleading advice by counsel to his client is not ground for relief, unless it clearly rises to the level of unprofessional conduct.” See, also, Mitchell v. United States, 104 App. D. C. 57, 62, 259 F. (2d) 787, 792; State v. Bailey, 270 Minn. 64 , 132 N. W. (2d) 720 ; State v. Gorman, 219 Minn. 162, 170 , 17 N. W. (2d) 42, 46 ; Annotation, 74 A. L. R. (2d) 1390, 1397.