Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Purdy, 153 N.W.2d 254.

41 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Keevin Lashawn Hinton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
the informant’s name need not be disclosed when the information was used as a basis for probable cause to search or arrest.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Dexter 929 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Dexter 929 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In State v. Purdy , 278 Minn. 133 , the Minnesota Supreme Court applied McCray in a case in which the defendant moved to suppress evidence obtained in a search incident to an arrest that was based on a confidential informant's tip.
Donny Warren, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See State v. Purdy , 278 Minn. 133, 147-48, 1 (holding that an officer’s testimony regarding a radio me ssage he received “was not introduced to prove the truth of the matter stated but only to prove .
State v. Rambahal 751 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 2008
State v. Rambahal 751 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 2008
See, State v. Werber, 301 Minn. 1, 7-9 , -51 (1974); State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133, 144
State v. Wessels 424 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
State v. Wessels 424 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See, e.g., State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133, 145
State v. Marshall 411 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Marshall 411 N.W.2d 276 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133
State v. Wiley 366 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1985
State v. Wiley 366 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1985
State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133, 145
State v. Hoven 269 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1978
State v. Houle 257 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1977
State v. Houle 257 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1977
In State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , we held that when an informant is a mere transmitter of information and not an active participant so as to be a competent witness to the crime itself, the informant’s name need not be disclosed.
State v. Luciow 240 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1976
State v. Luciow 240 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1976
See, State v. Villalon, 305 Minn. 547 , State v. Werber, 301 Minn. 1 , State v. Radil, 288 Minn. 279 , certiorari denied, 401 U. S. 921 , 91 S. Ct. *15 910, 27 L. ed. 2d 825 (1971); State v. DeSchoatz, 280 Minn. 3 , State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133
State v. Villalon 234 N.W.2d 189 Minn. 1975
State v. Villalon 234 N.W.2d 189 Minn. 1975
In State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , we held that when an informant is a mere transmitter of information and not an active participant so as to be a competent witness to the crime itself, the informant’s name need not be disclosed.
State v. Werber 221 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1974
State v. Werber 221 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1974
In these situations the trial court may require disclosure and, if the Government withholds the information, dismiss the action.” This court has had occasion to construe the Roviaro rule in State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133, 143 , and State v. DeSchoatz, 280 Minn. 3, 10
State v. Wiley 205 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1973
State v. Wiley 205 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1973
Cf. State v. Radil, 288 Minn. 279 , *417 certiorari denied, 401 U. S. 921 , 91 S. Ct. 910 , 27 L. ed. 2d 825 (1971); State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133
State v. Cvar 196 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1972
State v. Cvar 196 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1972
State v. Suess, 280 Minn. 308 , State v. DeSchoatz, 280 Minn. 3 , State v. Burch, 284 Minn. 300 , State v. Bagley, 286 Minn. 180 , State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , State v. Emerson, 266 Minn. 217 , United States v. Skinner, 412 F. 2d 98 (8 Cir. 1969); Raniele v. United States, 34 F. 2d 877 (8 Cir. 1929); Nathanson v. United States, 290 U. S. 41 , 54 S. Ct. 11 , 78 L. ed. 159 (1933); Spinelli v. United States, 393 U. S. 410 , 89
State v. Armstrong 194 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1972
State v. Armstrong 194 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1972
3 State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133, 142 , State v. Stewig, 281 Minn. 331, 333
State v. Radil 179 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1970
State v. Radil 179 N.W.2d 602 Minn. 1970
See, McCray v. Illinois, 386 U. S. 300, 311 , 87 S. Ct. 1056, 1062 , 18 L. ed. (2d) 62, 70; State v. DeSchoatz, 280 Minn. 3 , 157 N. W. (2d) 517 ; State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , 153 N. W. (2d) 254 .
Simberg v. State 179 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1970
Simberg v. State 179 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1970
See, also, State v. Harrison, 279 Minn. 310 , 156 N. W. (2d) 763 ; State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , 153 N. W. (2d) 254 .
State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
State v. Mastrian 171 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 1969
State v. Harrison, 279 Minn. 310 , 156 N. W. (2d) 763 ; State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , 153 N. W. (2d) 254 ; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 .
State v. McConoughey 163 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1968
State v. McConoughey 163 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1968
United States v. Rabinowitz, supra; State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , 153 N. W. (2d) 254 .
State v. DeSchoatz 157 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1968
State v. DeSchoatz 157 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1968
review the question of disclosure of an informant’s identity in State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , 153 N. W. (2d) 254 .
State v. Harrison 156 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1968
State v. Harrison 156 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1968
ommission of a felony by the person arrested.” This court has said: *316 “The constitutional mandate requiring ‘probable cause’ and the statutory standard of ‘reasonable cause’ are synonymous.” State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 263 , 121 N. W. (2d) 327, 330 , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. (2d) 94; State v. Sorenson, 270 Minn. 186 , 134 N. W. (2d) 115 ; State v. Purdy, 278 Minn. 133 , 153 N. W. (2d) 254 .