Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Campbell, 161 N.W.2d 47.

65 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Me’Darian Ledale McGruder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Me’Darian Ledale McGruder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(holding that intent to cause death may be inferred from the manner of shooting); (explaining “[a] finding of .
Dakota County Anderson, J. ConState of Minnesota v. Gabriel Alfonso Sanchez Cruz Minn. 2023
Dakota County Anderson, J. ConState of Minnesota v. Gabriel Alfonso Sanchez Cruz Minn. 2023
State of Minnesota v. John Kevin David Scruggs Minn. Ct. App. 2022
And in the context of a shooting, intent to kill “may be inferred from the manner of shooting the victim.”
Minn. 2020
“Intent to kill may be inferred from the manner of the killing.” 12 see also State v. Harris , (finding intent to kill after considering the severity of injuries to the victim); (noting that in tent to cause death “may be inferred from the manner of shooting the victim”).
State v. Brown 915 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Brown 915 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Campbell , 281 Minn. 1 , 10, , 54 (1968).
State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr. 859 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr. 859 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2015
State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 10 , ("[A]bsent unusual circumstances, an intrusion upon the body of a citizen should properly be made only by authority of a warrant issued by a magistrate, for it is a search and seizure within the limitations of the Fourth Amendment.”).
State v. Fardan 773 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2009
Stiles v. State 664 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2003
Stiles v. State 664 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2003
State v. Hanson, 286 Minn. 317, 325 , State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13
Dukes v. State 660 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2003
State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
In State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , the victim was shot in the head at close range after he threw a boning knife at the defendant who was pointing a gun at him.
State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Compare State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , (preparations for robbery and bringing of loaded gun supported finding of intent).
State v. Bickham 485 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1992
State v. Bickham 485 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1992
See State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , (one who obtains a loaded handgun for the purpose of carrying out a robbery raises a permissible inference of intent to kill); (intent may be inferred from the way victim was shot).
State v. Boitnott 443 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1989
State v. Boitnott 443 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1989
Additionally, in State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , we found intent to kill was supported by the defendant’s preparations for a robbery, taking a gun and ensuring it was loaded.
State v. Norris 428 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1988
State v. Norris 428 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1988
State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13
State v. Harris 405 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1987
State v. Harris 405 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1987
Intent to cause death “may be inferred from the manner of shooting the victim.” State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , (citation omitted)
Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13
State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
-31 (Minn.1978); State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1
State v. Lloyd 345 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1984
State v. Lloyd 345 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1984
State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13
State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
In State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , we sustained the defendant’s conviction where there was evidence that he had armed himself and examined the gun to make sure it contained live ammunition.
State v. Meizo 297 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1980
State v. Meizo 297 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1980
We had occasion to consider this precise question in the case of State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1
State v. Lee 282 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1979
State v. Lee 282 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1979
State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 12
State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 12
State v. Rosenthal 269 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1978
State v. Rosenthal 269 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1978
State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1
State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
Moreover, as the quoted excerpt states, premeditation can be inferred from either the number of gunshots fired into a victim, State v. Hare, supra, or the fact that a killer arms himself *431 with a loaded gun in preparation for the commission of a lesser crime, State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , State v. Gowdy, supra.
State v. Martin 261 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
State v. Martin 261 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
E. g., State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , certiorari denied, 391 U.S. 925 , 88 S.Ct.
State v. Gilbert 262 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1977
State v. Gilbert 262 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1977
6 State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1
State v. Phelps 209 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1973
State v. Phelps 209 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1973
See, State v. Burch, 284 Minn. 300 , State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1