DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Campbell, 161 N.W.2d 47.

65 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Me'Darian Ledale McGruder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
  • State of Minnesota v. Me'Darian Ledale McGruder Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    (holding that intent to cause death may be inferred from the manner of shooting); (explaining “[a] finding of .
  • Dakota County Anderson, J. ConState of Minnesota v. Gabriel Alfonso Sanchez Cruz Minn. 2023
  • Dakota County Anderson, J. ConState of Minnesota v. Gabriel Alfonso Sanchez Cruz Minn. 2023
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    And in the context of a shooting, intent to kill “may be inferred from the manner of shooting the victim.”
  • Minn. 2020
    “Intent to kill may be inferred from the manner of the killing.” 12 see also State v. Harris , (finding intent to kill after considering the severity of injuries to the victim); (noting that in tent to cause death “may be inferred from the manner of shooting the victim”).
  • State v. Brown 915 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
  • State v. Brown 915 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
    State v. Campbell , 281 Minn. 1 , 10, , 54 (1968).
  • State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr. 859 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr. 859 N.W.2d 762 Minn. 2015
    State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 10 , ("[A]bsent unusual circumstances, an intrusion upon the body of a citizen should properly be made only by authority of a warrant issued by a magistrate, for it is a search and seizure within the limitations of the Fourth Amendment.”).
  • State v. Fardan 773 N.W.2d 303 Minn. 2009
  • Stiles v. State 664 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2003
  • Stiles v. State 664 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2003
    State v. Hanson, 286 Minn. 317, 325 , State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13
  • Dukes v. State 660 N.W.2d 804 Minn. 2003
  • State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
  • State v. Thompson 544 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1996
    In State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , the victim was shot in the head at close range after he threw a boning knife at the defendant who was pointing a gun at him.
  • State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
  • State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
    Compare State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , (preparations for robbery and bringing of loaded gun supported finding of intent).
  • State v. Bickham 485 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Bickham 485 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1992
    See State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , (one who obtains a loaded handgun for the purpose of carrying out a robbery raises a permissible inference of intent to kill); (intent may be inferred from the way victim was shot).
  • State v. Boitnott 443 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Boitnott 443 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1989
    Additionally, in State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , we found intent to kill was supported by the defendant’s preparations for a robbery, taking a gun and ensuring it was loaded.
  • State v. Norris 428 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1988
  • State v. Norris 428 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1988
    State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13
  • State v. Harris 405 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1987
  • State v. Harris 405 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1987
    Intent to cause death “may be inferred from the manner of shooting the victim.” State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , (citation omitted)
  • Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
  • Bellcourt v. State 390 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1986
    State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13
  • State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Amos 347 N.W.2d 498 Minn. 1984
    -31 (Minn.1978); State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1
  • State v. Lloyd 345 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Lloyd 345 N.W.2d 240 Minn. 1984
    State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13
  • State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
    In State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 13 , we sustained the defendant’s conviction where there was evidence that he had armed himself and examined the gun to make sure it contained live ammunition.
  • State v. Meizo 297 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Meizo 297 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 1980
    We had occasion to consider this precise question in the case of State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1
  • State v. Lee 282 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Lee 282 N.W.2d 896 Minn. 1979
    State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 12
  • State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Merrill 274 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 1978
    State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1, 12
  • State v. Rosenthal 269 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Rosenthal 269 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1978
    State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
    Moreover, as the quoted excerpt states, premeditation can be inferred from either the number of gunshots fired into a victim, State v. Hare, supra, or the fact that a killer arms himself *431 with a loaded gun in preparation for the commission of a lesser crime, State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , State v. Gowdy, supra.
  • State v. Martin 261 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Martin 261 N.W.2d 341 Minn. 1977
    E. g., State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1 , State v. Hare, 278 Minn. 405 , certiorari denied, 391 U.S. 925 , 88 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gilbert 262 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Gilbert 262 N.W.2d 334 Minn. 1977
    6 State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1
  • State v. Phelps 209 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Phelps 209 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1973
    See, State v. Burch, 284 Minn. 300 , State v. Campbell, 281 Minn. 1