Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 177 N.W.2d 786.

40 citing documents.

Jerry M. Gelao, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
An easement is “an interest in land in the possession of another which entitles the owner of such interest to a limited use or enjoyment of the land in which the interest exists.” Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler
Richard L. Greenstreet v. Central Minnesota Educational Research & Development Council, Lowell ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Richard L. Greenstreet v. Central Minnesota Educational Research & Development Council, Lowell ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Leo Gadbois, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Robert Jensen v. Carl Rindelaub Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Robert Jensen v. Carl Rindelaub Minn. Ct. App. 2024
They rely on Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler for the principle that “[t]he sum total of these particular privileges of use makes up the extent of the easement.”
Wayne Willenberg v. Charles Frye, Karla Harrison, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Wayne Willenberg v. Charles Frye, Karla Harrison, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
An easement is, in short, “an interest in land in the possession of another which entitles the owner of such interest to a limited use or enjoyment of the land in which the interest exists.”
Carl Green, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Gas Co. , d 786, 789 (Minn. 1970).
In the Matter of the Application of Mojtaba Sharifkhani to Register Title to Certain Land. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Specifically, he cites Cohler to argue that it is “well settled” that an easement may not be expanded “beyond the objects originally contemplated or expressly agreed upon by the parties.” -90 (Minn. 1970).
Dellwood Farm, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(“A right-of-way is an easement only and a conveyance thereof is not a conveyance of the land itself.
Keith D. Bexell, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
An easement is “an interest in land in the possession of another which entitles the owner of such interest to a limited use or enjoyment of the land in which the interest exists.” Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler
William O. Bradley, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
An easement is “an interest in land in the possession of another which entitles the owner of such interest to a limited use or enjoyment of the land in which the interest exists.” Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler
William M. Dunkley, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
An easement is “an interest in land in the possession of another which entitles the owner of such interest to a limited use or enjoyment of the land in which the interest exists.”
KK-Five Corporation, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“It is elementary that an easement once granted is an estate which cannot be abridged or taken away, either by the grantor or his subsequent grantees.” Minneapolis Athletic C lub v. Cohler , (quotation omitted).
Ellen Kalahar-Grissom, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“It is elementary that an easement once granted is an estate which cannot be abridged or taken away, either by the grantor or his subsequent grantees.” Minneapolis Athletic Club v. C ohler, (quoting Grinnell Bros. v. Brown, 171 N.W.
John Athanasakoupolous, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Gas Co. , Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler , d 786, 789 (Minn. 1970).
James A. Compart, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Parcel D was hostile because their use exceeded the express gran t of the easement, which was “for ingress and egress and utility purposes over, under and across” Parcel D. “It is well settled that the extent of an easement should not be enlarged by legal construction beyond the objects originally contemplated or expre ssly agreed upon by the parties.” Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 258, –90 (1970).
Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry Hopkins 863 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry Hopkins 863 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Generally, the grant of an easement over land does not preclude the grantor from using the land in a manner not unreasonably interfering with the special use for which the easement was acquired.” Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 258
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
But see Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 257 , (stating "right-of-way is an easement only and a conveyance thereof is not a conveyance of the land itself").
State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 684 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 684 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
See Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 258 , (citing Restatement (First) of Property, § 450 (1944)).
Block v. Sexton 577 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Block v. Sexton 577 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
At the same time, “[i]t is well settled that the extent of an easement should not be enlarged by legal construction beyond the objects originally contemplated or expressly agreed upon by the parties.” Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 258
Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co. 575 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1998
Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co. 575 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1998
Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 258
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Pine Valley Meats, Inc. v. Canal Capital Corp. 566 N.W.2d 357 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 258 , (citing Restatement of Property § 450 (1944)).
Bergh & Misson Farms, Inc. v. Great Lakes Transmission Co. 565 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 1997
Bergh & Misson Farms, Inc. v. Great Lakes Transmission Co. 565 N.W.2d 23 Minn. 1997
See also Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 258 , (“[T]he extent of the easement created by a conveyance is fixed by the terms of the conveyance.”) (citing Restatement of Property § 482).
Larson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Larson v. Amundson 414 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 258 , -90 (1970).
Edgewater Cottage Ass'n, Inc. v. Watson 387 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Edgewater Cottage Ass'n, Inc. v. Watson 387 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 257
Braaten v. Jarvi 347 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Braaten v. Jarvi 347 N.W.2d 279 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
An easement is defined as “an interest in land in the possession of another which entitles the owner of such interest to a limited use or enjoyment of the land in which the interest exists.” Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254, 258 , (citing Restatement, Property, § 450).
State Ex Rel. Washington Wildlife Preservation, Inc. v. State 329 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1983
State Ex Rel. Washington Wildlife Preservation, Inc. v. State 329 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 1983
Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler, 287 Minn. 254