Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ellanson, 198 N.W.2d 136.

27 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(holding that the observation of a single open-bottle violation justified searching anywhere in the car where there may be another open bottle).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
688 (Minn. 1982) (stating that a police officer “could have searched the car for other evidence relating to the open-bottle violation” after observing the driver and passenger of a car drinking from cups that the police officer believed contained alcohol); (concluding search of glove compartment was reasonable based on violation of open-bottle law); 735-36 (Minn. App. 1987) (concluding that a police officer had probable cause to search a vehicle when he observed an open container of alcohol in p
State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Nancy Marie Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Nancy Marie Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
6 (Minn. App. 2001) (“[C]ontinuous weaving within one’s own lane is sufficient by itself to create a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity to support a traffic stop.”); (“Even observing a motor vehicle weaving within its own lane in an erratic manner can justify an officer stopping a driver.”); (holding that an officer may stop a vehicle weaving within its lane to investigate the cause of the unusual driving).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 136, 137 (Minn. 1972) (concluding search of glove compartment was reasonable based on violation of open-bottle law).
, A21-1425 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
137 (Minn. 1972) (holding that a traffic stop was justified when an officer observed a vehicle weaving within its lane but did not believe the weaving constituted a traffic violation because the officer “had a right to stop defendant in order to investigate the cause of the unusual driving” ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See, (concluding that officer who had observed 4 a vehicle “weaving within its lane .
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Additionally, in State v. Ellanson , the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a traffic stop was justified when an officer observed a vehicle weaving within its la ne but did not believe the weaving constituted a traffic violation because the officer “had a right to stop defendant in order to investigate the cause of the unusual driving.” 293 Minn. 490, 491, see Morse, d at 502 (citing Ellanson and concluding that police had reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle when squad-car video showed defenda
State of Minnesota v. Ralph Joseph Thunder Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Ralph Joseph Thunder Minn. Ct. App. 2017
weaving within one’s own lane is sufficient by itself to create a 3 reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity to support a traffic stop.” see also Morse, d at 502 (upholding stop of pickup truck that squad-car video showed to be “drifting in its lane”); State v. Ellanson, 293 Minn. 490, 490-91, (upholding stop of vehicle when officer observed vehicle weaving within its own lane, but not violating traffic laws, because the officer “had a right to stop [the driver] to investigate the c
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse 878 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse 878 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2016
State v. Ellanson, 293 Minn. 490, 490-91, (concluding the stop was reasonable because the officer “had a right to stop [the driver] in order to investigate the cause of the unusual driving”).
Jobe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 609 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jobe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 609 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
784 (Minn.1980) (stop justified when car was travel-ling 15 to 20 miles per hour in 30 miles per hour speed zone and weaving within its own lane); State v. Ellanson, 293 Minn. 490, 490-91 , (officer had right to stop driver to investigate unusual driving after observing driver swerving within his own lane).
State v. Kvam 336 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1983
State v. Kvam 336 N.W.2d 525 Minn. 1983
State v. Ellanson, 293 Minn. 490
State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
State v. Alesso 328 N.W.2d 685 Minn. 1982
State v. Ellanson, 293 Minn. 490
State v. Veigel 304 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 1981
State v. Veigel 304 N.W.2d 900 Minn. 1981
The district court ruled that motor-vehicle exception to the warrant requirement had no application and distinguished this case from State v. Ellanson, 293 Minn. 490 , (upholding search of glove compartment for evidence of open-bottle violation) on the ground that the glove compartment in this case was locked whereas the glove compartment in the El-lanson case was unlocked.
State v. Barber 241 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 1976
State v. Barber 241 N.W.2d 476 Minn. 1976
Paul v. Vaughn, 306 Minn. 337 , State v. Scroggins, 297 Minn. 144 , State v. Ellanson, 293 Minn. 490 , State v. Fish, 280 Minn. 163
State v. Wicklund 205 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 1973
State v. Wicklund 205 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 1973
State v. Ellanson, 293 Minn. 490 , State v. Fish, 280 Minn. 163