DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lindquist, 205 N.W.2d 333.

38 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
  • State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    (explaining that an informant who is not anonymous is more likely to be honest because he or she likely knows that police could arrest him or her for making false reports).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    A n informant “who voluntarily comes forward and identifies herself is more likely to be telling the truth because she presumably knows that the police could arrest her for making a false report.”
  • Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    -83 (Minn. 2007); State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400, (“One who voluntarily comes forward and identifies [himself] is more likely to be telling the truth because [he] presumably knows that the police could arrest [him] for making a false report.”).
  • State of Minnesota v. Ronald Keith Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Ronald Keith Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    See State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400, (“One who voluntarily comes forward and identifies herself is more likely to be telling the truth because she presumably knows that the police could arrest her for making a false report.”).
  • State of Minnesota v. Cooper Allen Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
  • State of Minnesota v. Cooper Allen Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
    State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400
  • State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Jones 678 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2004
    See State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400 , (stating that an informant who does not remain anonymous is more likely to be telling the truth be *12 cause she could be arrested for making false statements).
  • State v. Balenger 667 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • State v. Balenger 667 N.W.2d 133 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    adio communication from unidentified trucker was sufficient to support investigative stop of car, even though trooper saw nothing improper in operation of car, because trucker was private citizen and his reliability could be presumed); (concluding that first-time citizen informer’s credibility is generally presumed); see also State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400 , (considering fact that tipster was first-time private citizen informer not involved in the criminal event himself in assessing reli
  • State v. Hochstein 623 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Hochstein 623 N.W.2d 617 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    See State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400 , (“One who voluntarily comes forward and identifies herself is more likely to be telling the truth because she presumably knows that the police could arrest her for making a false report.” (citations omitted)).
  • State v. Camp 590 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Camp 590 N.W.2d 115 Minn. 1999
    See State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400 , (determining that an informant who is not anonymous is more likely to be telling the truth because he or she presumably knows that the police could arrest him or her for making a false report); (determining that the informant's reliabili
  • State v. McCloskey 451 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
  • State v. McCloskey 451 N.W.2d 225 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
    “One who voluntarily comes forward and identifies herself is more likely to be telling the truth * * *.” State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398
  • State v. Gabbert 411 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Gabbert 411 N.W.2d 209 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    In State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398 , the informant voluntarily came forward and identified herself to the police.
  • Vivier v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Vivier v. Commissioner of Public Safety 406 N.W.2d 587 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400
  • State v. Davis 393 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Davis 393 N.W.2d 179 Minn. 1986
    Cf., State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400 , (holding that police were justified in arresting person on basis of information provided directly to police by named citizen informer; reliance on the information was justified in part because the informant, by giving her name, "presumably [knew] that the police could arrest her for m
  • State v. Davis 390 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Eling 355 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Eling 355 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1984
    See State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 401
  • State v. Wiberg 296 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Wiberg 296 N.W.2d 388 Minn. 1980
    State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 401
  • State v. Siegfried 274 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Siegfried 274 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1978
    See, also, State v. Mollberg, 310 Minn. 376 , State v. Phelps, 297 Minn. 61 , State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398 , State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252
  • State v. Ruud 259 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Ruud 259 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1977
    See, State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398 , State v. Cvar, 293 Minn. 439
  • State v. Mollberg 246 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Mollberg 246 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1976
    In State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398, 400 , this court observed that “[o]ne who voluntarily comes forward and identifies [himself] is more likely to be telling the truth because [he] presumably knows that the police could arrest [him] for making a false report.” Second, there is no indication that the informant, Jerome Krohn
  • State v. Phelps 209 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Phelps 209 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1973
    State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398 , State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252