Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 228 N.W.2d 562.

41 citing documents.

Larry Koch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The purpose of such relief is “to maintain the status quo until the case can be decided on the merits.” Pickerign v. Pasco Mktg., Inc., d 562, 564 (Minn. 1975) (emphasis added) .
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ... 7 N.W.3d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota by Smart Growth Minneapolis, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation v. City of ... 7 N.W.3d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A temporary injunction is granted “before a trial on the merits” when a defendant’s “liability has not yet been determined.” (quotation omitted); see also Pickerign v. Pasco Mktg., Inc., (“The granting of a temporary injunction serves only to maintain the status quo until the case can be decided on the merits.”).
Steve Simon, in his official capacity as Minnesota Secretary of State, Minn. 2020
9 Because a temporary injunction is granted before a trial on the merits, “a showing of irreparable harm is required to prevent undue hardship to the party against whom the injunction is issued, whose liability has not yet been determined.” Cherne Indus., Inc. v. Grounds & Assocs., Inc., see Pickerign v. Pasco Mktg., Inc., (explaining that a temporary injunction is appropriate “when it is apparent that the rights of a party will be irreparably injured before a trial on the merits .
Lance Gerald Milliman, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Pickerign v. Pasco Mktg., Inc.
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 638 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins Partnership 638 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Pickerign v. Pasco Mktg., Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 444
Upper Midwest Sales Co. v. Ecolab, Inc. 577 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Upper Midwest Sales Co. v. Ecolab, Inc. 577 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Pickerign v. Pasco Mktg., Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 446
Sanborn Manufacturing Co. v. Currie 500 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Sanborn Manufacturing Co. v. Currie 500 N.W.2d 161 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Pickerign v. Pasco Mktg., Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 446
Morse v. City of Waterville 458 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Morse v. City of Waterville 458 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Picke-rign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 444
Bio-Line, Inc. v. Burman 404 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bio-Line, Inc. v. Burman 404 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 446
STATE EX REL. NEIGHBORS ORG., ETC. v. Dotty 396 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
STATE EX REL. NEIGHBORS ORG., ETC. v. Dotty 396 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In discussing the relationship between the parties, the trial court emphasized preserving the status quo, citing Pickering v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 446
Rosewood Mortgage Corp. v. Hefty 383 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Rosewood Mortgage Corp. v. Hefty 383 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 444
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc. 372 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
ANALYSIS The trial court based its construction of the agreement in part on Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442 , and in part on its view that the law was moving away from the presumption favoring at-will termination of employment or dealership contracts.
North Star State Bank of Roseville v. North Star Bank Minnesota 365 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
North Star State Bank of Roseville v. North Star Bank Minnesota 365 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Pickerign v. PASCO Marketing Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 444
Integrated Development & Manufacturing Co. v. University of Minnesota 363 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Integrated Development & Manufacturing Co. v. University of Minnesota 363 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
(citing Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 444 , ).
North Star State Bank of Roseville v. North Star Bank Minnesota 361 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
North Star State Bank of Roseville v. North Star Bank Minnesota 361 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 444
Hollenkamp v. Peters 358 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hollenkamp v. Peters 358 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 446
Miller v. Foley 317 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1982
Miller v. Foley 317 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1982
Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc. , 303 Minn. 442 , 444 , , 564 (1975).
Berggren v. Town of Duluth 304 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1981
Berggren v. Town of Duluth 304 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1981
Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 446
Mason v. Farmers Insurance Companies 281 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1979
Mason v. Farmers Insurance Companies 281 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 1979
Mason relies heavily on Pickerígn v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442
Kossak v. Stalling 277 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
Kossak v. Stalling 277 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
Hvamstad v. City of Rochester 276 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 1979
Hvamstad v. City of Rochester 276 N.W.2d 632 Minn. 1979
Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 444 , Thompson v. *633 Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 533 , Gramond v. AFL-CIO, supra, 267 Minn. 234 , .
Bud Johnson Construction Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 272 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1978
Bud Johnson Construction Co. v. Metropolitan Transit Commission 272 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1978
Pickerign v. Pasco Marketing, Inc., 303 Minn. 442, 444 , Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 533 , Cramond v. AFL-CIO, 267 Minn. 229, 234

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by