Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Zappa v. Fahey, 245 N.W.2d 258.

92 citing documents.

Coleen Christensen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Corp., (noting that prejudice is a question of fact); Nisbet, d at 321 (concluding municipality must prove prejudice before claim can be dismissed under section 466.05); -60 (Minn. 1976) (defining material fact as one that affects the result or outcome of the case ).
Doran MGC I, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A fact is material if it “is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” -60 (Minn. 1976).
Thomas Brule Trucking, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A fact is material if it “ is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” -60 (Minn. 1976).
Angie M. Barsness, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” -60 (Minn. 1976).
Kelly Bell, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” d 258, 259-60 (Minn. 1976).
John Joseph Wawersich, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” -60 (Minn. 1976).
In the Matter of the Petition of: Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A material fact 5 is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution,” -60 (Minn. 1976), and inferences and doubts about material facts are resolved in favor of the nonmoving party
Ronald G. Davis, Personal Representative of the Estate of Roger F. Davis and Trustee of the Toivo W. … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” -60 (Minn. 1976).
Paul Stepnes, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Zappa v. Fahey , -60 (Minn. 1976).
Michelle Friesen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In Re: The Matter of the Petition for Project No. 77, Clay County Ditch No. 51-Lateral No. 3, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Zappa v. Fahey , -60 (Minn. 1976).
Thumper Pond Resort, LLC d/b/a Thumper Pond Resort, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A fact is mate rial if it “is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” -60 (Minn. 1976).
Shelley Lynn Yocom, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Inc. v. Russ , (“[T]here is no genuine issue of material fact for trial when the nonmoving party presents evidence which merely creates a metaphysical doubt as to a factual issue and which is not sufficiently probative with respect to an essential element of the nonmoving party’s case to permit reasonable persons to draw different conclusions.”); -60 (Minn. 1976) (defining “material fact” as one that is determinative to resolution of the case).
Shane Reasner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.”
A17-0297 A17-0059 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556, –60 (1976).
James F. Edgar, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556, –60 (1976).
Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” Zappa v. Fahey , 310 Minn. 555, 556, 2 -60 (1976 ).
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as certificate trustee on behalf of Bosco Credit II Trust Series 2010-1, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” Zappa v. Fahey , 310 Minn. 555, 556, 2 -60 (1976 ).
Troy K. Scheffler v. City of Anoka, City of Coon Rapids, Hicken, Scott, Howard & Anderson, P. A. 890 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Troy K. Scheffler v. City of Anoka, City of Coon Rapids, Hicken, Scott, Howard & Anderson, P. A. 890 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556, –60 (1976).
RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
RK Midway, LLC v. Metropolitan Council Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A material fact is one that will “affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556, –60 (1976).
Jeffrey Beckman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Robert A. Tenold v. Green Line Home Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jeffrey Beckman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Robert A. Tenold v. Green Line Home Services, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556, -60 (1976) (stating that a fact is material if its resolution would affect the result or outcome of the case).
Michael and Jean Antonello v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 884 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 2016
Michael and Jean Antonello v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator. 884 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 2016
Bond, d at 836 (quoting Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556, -60 (1976)).
Minnesota Workers� Compensation Assigned Risk Plan as administered by RTW, Inc. v. Dimas Reyes, Advanced Designs Siding and … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minnesota Workers� Compensation Assigned Risk Plan as administered by RTW, Inc. v. Dimas Reyes, Advanced Designs Siding and … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.” Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556, -60 (1976).
Nicole Curtis v. Jason Jenny Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Nicole Curtis v. Jason Jenny Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556, -60 (1976).
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Erlandson 821 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Erlandson 821 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
P. 56.03; see Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556 , -60 (1976) (stating, for summary judgment purposes, that “[a] material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case”).
Sayer v. Minnesota Department of Transportation 790 N.W.2d 151 Minn. 2010
Simons v. Shiltz 741 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Simons v. Shiltz 741 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556 , -60 (1976).
Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556 , -60 (1976).
Bond v. Commissioner of Revenue 691 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2005
Bond v. Commissioner of Revenue 691 N.W.2d 831 Minn. 2005
2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556 , -60 (1976) (stating “[a] material fact is one of such a nature as will affect the result or outcome of the case depending on its resolution.”).
American Parkinson Disease Ass'n v. First National Bank of Northfield 584 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
American Parkinson Disease Ass'n v. First National Bank of Northfield 584 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556 , -60 (1976).
Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance Companies 568 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance Companies 568 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556 , -60 (1976).
Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co. 562 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co. 562 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556 , -60 (1976).
Allison v. Best Recycling & Disposal, Inc. 565 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Allison v. Best Recycling & Disposal, Inc. 565 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556 , -60 (1976).
St. Cloud Police Relief Ass'n v. City of St. Cloud 555 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
St. Cloud Police Relief Ass'n v. City of St. Cloud 555 N.W.2d 318 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Zappa v. Fahey, 310 Minn. 555, 556 , -60 (1976).