Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Carlson, 268 N.W.2d 553.

82 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
n. 2014) (victim tried to punch defendant); –24 (Minn. 2006) (victim kicked and shot defendant); (victim hit defendant); (victim punched defendant); (victim kicked defendant in the head); (victim police officer pushed defendant’s friend); –36 (Minn. 1978) (victim fired shots); (victim hit defendant with umbrella); (victim punched and kicked defendant)
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Berry Alan Willis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. W. A., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Evidence is relevant if “in some degree it advances the inquiry and thus has probative value.”
State of Minnesota v. Luke Vernon Kjono Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Luke Vernon Kjono Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Charles Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Charles Owens Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that the defendant “is entitled to have all the elements of the offense with which he is charged submitted [to the jury] even if the evidence relating to these elements is uncontradicted”).
State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 553, 561 (Minn. 1978).
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Trevon Fuller Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alan Pourrier Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Koppi 779 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Koppi 779 N.W.2d 562 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
A defendant “is entitled to have all the elements of the offense with which he is charged submitted even if the evidence relating to these elements is un-contradicted.”
State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
State v. Jackson 770 N.W.2d 470 Minn. 2009
(); (“Reversal is warranted only when the error substantially influences the jury’s decision.”).
State v. Hooks 752 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Hooks 752 N.W.2d 79 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
So also, a defendant “is entitled to have all the elements of the offense with which he is charged submitted [to the jury] even if the evidence relating to these elements is uncontradicted.”
State v. Ouellette 740 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Ouellette 740 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“[A defendant] is entitled to have all the elements of the offense with which he is charged submitted [to the jury] even if the evidence relating to these elements is un-contradicted.”
State v. Schulz 691 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 2005
State v. Schulz 691 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 2005
State v. Chuon 596 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Chuon 596 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
(holding that evidence of motorcycle club insignia, relevant only to defendant’s state of mind in prosecution for obstructing arrest, was too prejudicial to be admissible).
State v. Harris 521 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1994
State v. Harris 521 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 1994
Generally, evidence is relevant if “in some degree it advances the inquiry and thus has probative value.” (per curiam).
State v. Lunsford 507 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Lunsford 507 N.W.2d 239 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(new trial for inadequate jury instructions will not be granted if it is unlikely jury was confused).
State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Bock 490 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
(testimony regarding defendant’s clothing erroneously admitted).
State v. Oslund 469 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Oslund 469 N.W.2d 489 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Glaze 452 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1990
State v. Glaze 452 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 1990
State v. Williams 451 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Williams 451 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Thurston, 299 Minn. 30, 35
State v. Shamp 427 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1988
State v. Shamp 427 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1988
State v. Sobocinski 395 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sobocinski 395 N.W.2d 128 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the supreme court required an instruction on defendant’s theory that he did not intentionally obstruct an arrest because of his failure to know that those who took custody of his friend were police officers.
State v. Bissell 368 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1985
State v. Bissell 368 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1985
we stated that a criminal defendant is “entitled to have all the elements of the offense with which he is charged submitted even if the evidence relating to these elements is un-contradicted,” but added that “if the defendant admits certain elements, then the court can so instruct the jury.” We also
State v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1985
State v. Daniels 361 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1985
State v. Larson 358 N.W.2d 668 Minn. 1984

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by