Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Theros v. Phillips, 256 N.W.2d 852.

69 citing documents.

Paul A. Kruger, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“The evidence supporting reformation of a written instrument, including a deed, must be consistent, clear, unequivocal, and convincing.” d 852, 857 (Minn. 1977).
In re the Matter of the Application of Mekonnen Tulu and Tadelech N. Guda to Register the Title … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(quotation omitted); see also Gabler, d at 729.
Russel D. Stueckrath, et al., Plaintiffs, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
A19-1585 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
David R. Towley, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Scott Sundgaard, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Donald Sundgaard, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Petition of Melvin J. Cummins for an Order Determining Boundary Lines Minn. Ct. App. 2018
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Carter 899 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
While we agree that ordinarily the decision to grant or deny an injunction is discretionary, (stating that grant of permanent injunctions rests within “sound discretion” of district court), in this case, Carter entered into an employment contract with St.
In the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., for an Order Determining the Boundary … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Petition of Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., for an Order Determining the Boundary … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re Minnwest Bank Litigation Concerning Real Property in Otsego, Minnesota, Minnwest Bank v. RTB, LLC 873 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re Minnwest Bank Litigation Concerning Real Property in Otsego, Minnesota, Minnwest Bank v. RTB, LLC 873 N.W.2d 135 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Generally a permanent injunction is the “‘proper remedy to restrain a continuous and repeatedly threatened trespass.’” Wojahn, d at 307 ().
In the Matter of the Application of Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Application of Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
d 852, 858 (Minn. 1977).
In the Matter of the Petition of Melvin J. Cummins for an Order Determining Boundary Lines. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Petition of Melvin J. Cummins for an Order Determining Boundary Lines. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ruikkie v. Nall 798 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Ruikkie v. Nall 798 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
The effect of boundary by practical location “is to divest one party of property”; accordingly, “the evidence establishing the practical location must be clear, positive, and unequivocal.”
Britney v. Swan Lake Cabin Corp. 795 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Britney v. Swan Lake Cabin Corp. 795 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Premier Bank v. Becker Development, LLC 767 N.W.2d 691 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Slindee v. Fritch Investments, LLC 760 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Slindee v. Fritch Investments, LLC 760 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Gabler v. Fedoruk 756 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Estate of Savich 671 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Estate of Savich 671 N.W.2d 746 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
eed if it is proved that (1) there was a valid agreement between the parties expressing their real intentions; (2) the written instrument allegedly evidencing the agreement failed to express the real intentions of the parties; and (3) this failure was due to a mutual mistake of the parties, or a
Pratt Investment Co. v. Kennedy 636 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Pratt Investment Co. v. Kennedy 636 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
To acquire land by practical location of boundaries by acquiescence, a person must a show by evidence that is clear, positive, and unequivocal that the alleged property line was “acquiesced in for a sufficient length of time to bar a right of entry under the statute of limitations.”
Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc. 624 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Citizens for a Safe Grant v. Lone Oak Sportsmen's Club, Inc. 624 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Manderfeld v. Krovitz 539 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Manderfeld v. Krovitz 539 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
( Fritz v. Fritz, 94 Minn. 264 , 102 N.W.
Carey and Emmings, Ltd. v. Ludowese 434 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Carey and Emmings, Ltd. v. Ludowese 434 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-59 (Minn. 1977) (citations omitted).
Nunnelee v. Schuna 431 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nunnelee v. Schuna 431 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nolan v. Stuebner 429 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nolan v. Stuebner 429 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Weis v. Kozak 410 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Weis v. Kozak 410 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Phillips v. Blowers, 281 *907 Minn. 267, 269, , 526 (1968).
Sullivan v. Eginton 406 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sullivan v. Eginton 406 N.W.2d 599 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
LeeJoice v. Harris 404 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
LeeJoice v. Harris 404 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Phillips v. Blowers, 281 Minn. 267, 269
Lake Mille Lacs Investment, Inc. v. Payne 401 N.W.2d 387 Minn. Ct. App. 1987