Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hengel v. Hyatt, 252 N.W.2d 105.

38 citing documents.

In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Hengel v. Hyatt , d 105, 106 (Minn. 1977).
Solution Blue Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
or other proof of a valid defense is provided, the motion to vacate will be denied.” see also Valley View, (stating a valid defense may be presented in an affidavit, answer, or in the record), rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Mary J. Dykstra, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Griffs, d at 531; (“It is elementary that a motion to vacate a judgment for lack of jurisdiction merely asserts 7 that the judgment is void and involves no question of discretion.” ( citing Minn. R. Civ.
In re the Matter of: Briley Ann Hale, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Berg, Debele, DeSmidt & Rabuse, P.A., f/d/b/a Walling, Berg & Debele, P. A., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Hengel v. Hyatt , 312 Minn. 317, 318
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Laymon v. Minnesota Premier Properties, LLC 903 N.W.2d 6 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
As recognized by the district court, “service of process is the means by which a court obtains personal jurisdiction over a defendant,” McCullough & Sons, and default judgment may not be entered against a defendant over whom the court has no personal jurisdiction, see Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 318 , (“If the judgment is void for lack of jurisdiction, it must be set aside ....
Livingston Financial, LLC, as successor in interest to US Bank, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hengel v. Hyatt , 312 Minn. 317, 318
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton 869 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ferdinand Leo Gams, Jr. v. Steven Ronald Houghton 869 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Northland Temporaries, d at 402 (citing Vrooman Floor Covering Inc. v. Dorsey, 267 Minn. 318, 322 , and Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 319 , ).
Insulation Distributors, Inc. v. William J. Bourque, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Insulation Distributors, Inc. v. William J. Bourque, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 318
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 758 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Langston v. Wilson McShane Corp. 758 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See Vrooman Floor Covering Inc. v. Dorsey, 267 Minn. 318, 322 , (reversing order to reopen judgment when movant failed to show reasonable defense on merits); Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 319 , (“If no affidavit of merit or other proof of a valid defense is provided, the motion to vacate will be denied.”).
Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin 744 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Northland Temporaries, Inc. v. Turpin 744 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See Vrooman Floor Covering Inc. v. Dorsey, 267 Minn. 318, 322 , (reversing an order to reopen judgment when movant failed to show reasonable defense on merits); see also Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 319 , (“If no affidavit of merit or other proof of a valid defense is provided, the motion to vacate will be denied.”).
Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings Unit 633 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Commissioner of Natural Resources v. Nicollet County Public Water/Wetlands Hearings Unit 633 N.W.2d 25 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 318 , (“If the judgment is void for lack of jurisdiction, it must be set aside without regard to such factors as the existence of a meritorious defense.”) The existence of personal jurisdiction is a question of law subject to de novo review.
Patterson v. Wu Family Corp. 594 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Patterson v. Wu Family Corp. 594 N.W.2d 540 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 318-19 , -06 (Minn.1977) (when defendant testified regarding the location of her usual place of abode, district court did not err in finding that her father’s home was not her usual place of abode); Peterson, d at 225 (affirming district court’s finding that address listed in official reco
Larson v. New Richland Care Center 520 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Larson v. New Richland Care Center 520 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317 , -07 (1977) (defendant who sought to serve answer and counterclaim which were returned to her before court entered default judgment against her did not submit to court’s jurisdiction); Mississippi Valley, 300 Minn. at 71 , d at 763 (defendant who obtained extensions of time to file motion
Peterson v. Eishen 512 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1994
Peterson v. Eishen 512 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1994
Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317
Midway National Bank v. Estate of Bollmeier 504 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Midway National Bank v. Estate of Bollmeier 504 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 318
Marriage of Peterson v. Eishen 495 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Marriage of Peterson v. Eishen 495 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 318
Charson v. Temple Israel 419 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
Charson v. Temple Israel 419 N.W.2d 488 Minn. 1988
See, e.g., Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317
Charson v. Temple Israel 405 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Charson v. Temple Israel 405 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317 , (“[i]f no affidavit of merit or other proof of a valid defense is provided, the motion to vacate will be denied”) (citing Vrooman Floor Covering, Inc. v. Dorsey, 267 Minn. 318
Bernick v. CABOOSE ENTERPRISES, INC. 395 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bernick v. CABOOSE ENTERPRISES, INC. 395 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 318
Grunke v. Kloskin 355 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Grunke v. Kloskin 355 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317, 319
Wachsmuth v. Johnson 352 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Distinguished Wachsmuth v. Johnson 352 N.W.2d 132 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
This case is readily distinguishable from Hengel v. Hyatt, 312 Minn. 317 , where the defendant’s first filing with the court following entry of the default judgment was a motion to vacate the judgment.