Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ruud, 259 N.W.2d 567.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(quoting 7 State v. Ruud , ).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nonetheless, even wh ere the evidence supports giving a party’s proposed instruction, “[t]he court need not give the instruction as requested by the party if 15 it determines that the substance of that request is contained in the court’s charge.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A defendant is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case “if there is evidence to support it.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nonetheless, even where the eviden ce supports giving a party’s proposed instruction, “[t]he court need not give the instruction as requested by the party if it determines that the substance of that request is contained in the court’s charge.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A defendant “is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“It is beyond dispute that a party is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is ev idence to support it.”
- State of Minnesota v. Damien Tito Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Damien Tito Jones
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A criminal defendant “is entitled to an instruction on ‘his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.’” ().
- State v. Wilson 830 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 2013
- State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-
State v. Bauer
776 N.W.2d 462
Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“[A] party is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.”
- State v. Jacobson 681 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
State v. Jacobson
681 N.W.2d 398
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See, (holding that district court did not err by refusing to instruct jury that defendant’s reliance on accountant’s advice negated their intent to commit theft and present false claims to a public body, because defendants failed to fully and fairly disclose all of their actions to their accountant); State
- State v. Miller 666 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2003
-
State v. Miller
666 N.W.2d 703
Minn. 2003
(‘We have recognized that there is a degree of flexibility to the particularity requirement.”); (“A warrant can only be as specific as the nature of the materials sought will allow.”).
- State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
- State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
- State v. Torres 632 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2001
-
State v. Torres
632 N.W.2d 609
Minn. 2001
“It is beyond dispute that a party is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.”
- State v. Kuhnau 622 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 2001
- State v. Kuhnau 622 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 2001
- State v. Bashire 606 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
State v. Bashire
606 N.W.2d 449
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
As a general rule, “a party is entitled to [a jury] instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.”
- State v. Lopez 587 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1998
- State v. Lopez 587 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1998
- State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Shoen
578 N.W.2d 708
Minn. 1998
cert, denied, 435 U.S. 996 , 98 S.Ct.
- State v. Pendleton 567 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1997
- State v. Pendleton 567 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1997
- State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
- State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
- State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Holmberg 527 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Holmberg 527 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- State v. Persitz 518 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1994
- State v. Persitz 518 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1994
- State v. McCuiston 514 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. McCuiston 514 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
- State v. Jones 498 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Jones 498 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
- State v. Patterson 493 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
State v. Patterson
493 N.W.2d 577
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); cert, denied, 435 U.S. 996 , 98 S.Ct.
- State v. Hart 477 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
State v. Hart
477 N.W.2d 732
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Daniels, d at 832; cert.
- State v. Battin 474 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Battin 474 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Fortman 474 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Fortman 474 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
- State v. Starfield 472 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1991