Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ruud, 259 N.W.2d 567.

97 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(quoting 7 State v. Ruud , ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Nonetheless, even wh ere the evidence supports giving a party’s proposed instruction, “[t]he court need not give the instruction as requested by the party if 15 it determines that the substance of that request is contained in the court’s charge.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A defendant is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case “if there is evidence to support it.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nonetheless, even where the eviden ce supports giving a party’s proposed instruction, “[t]he court need not give the instruction as requested by the party if it determines that the substance of that request is contained in the court’s charge.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A defendant “is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“It is beyond dispute that a party is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is ev idence to support it.”
State of Minnesota v. Damien Tito Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Damien Tito Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A criminal defendant “is entitled to an instruction on ‘his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.’” ().
State v. Wilson 830 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 2013
State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Bauer 776 N.W.2d 462 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“[A] party is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.”
State v. Jacobson 681 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Jacobson 681 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
See, (holding that district court did not err by refusing to instruct jury that defendant’s reliance on accountant’s advice negated their intent to commit theft and present false claims to a public body, because defendants failed to fully and fairly disclose all of their actions to their accountant); State
State v. Miller 666 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2003
State v. Miller 666 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2003
(‘We have recognized that there is a degree of flexibility to the particularity requirement.”); (“A warrant can only be as specific as the nature of the materials sought will allow.”).
State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
State v. Yang 644 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 2002
State v. Torres 632 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2001
State v. Torres 632 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2001
“It is beyond dispute that a party is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.”
State v. Kuhnau 622 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 2001
State v. Kuhnau 622 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 2001
State v. Bashire 606 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
State v. Bashire 606 N.W.2d 449 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
As a general rule, “a party is entitled to [a jury] instruction on his theory of the case if there is evidence to support it.”
State v. Lopez 587 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1998
State v. Lopez 587 N.W.2d 26 Minn. 1998
State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
State v. Shoen 578 N.W.2d 708 Minn. 1998
cert, denied, 435 U.S. 996 , 98 S.Ct.
State v. Pendleton 567 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1997
State v. Pendleton 567 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1997
State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
State v. Auchampach 540 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1995
State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Brodie 529 N.W.2d 395 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Holmberg 527 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Holmberg 527 N.W.2d 100 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Persitz 518 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1994
State v. Persitz 518 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1994
State v. McCuiston 514 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. McCuiston 514 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Jones 498 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Jones 498 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Patterson 493 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Patterson 493 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
1123 , 43 L.Ed.2d 396 (1975); cert, denied, 435 U.S. 996 , 98 S.Ct.
State v. Hart 477 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Hart 477 N.W.2d 732 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Daniels, d at 832; cert.
State v. Battin 474 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Battin 474 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Fortman 474 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Fortman 474 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Starfield 472 N.W.2d 143 Minn. Ct. App. 1991