Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Moss, 269 N.W.2d 732.

28 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mervel George Jones, III, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Mervel George Jones, III, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
The state nonetheless urges us to conclude that Jones’s argument is forfeited based on an earlier supreme court decision
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(holding that evidence supported inference that defendant intended to use scissors during a robbery if their use became necessary, making the scissors a dangerous weapon).
State of Minnesota v. John Ishmael Bradley, III Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. John Ishmael Bradley, III Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-35 (Minn. 1978); see 4 (holding that conviction of a defendant who submitted to trial without objecting to alleged bias will be reversed only if defendant can show actual bias), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester 913 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 2018
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester 913 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 2018
Taxes ), , 206 (Minn. 1995) (acknowledging possibility that decision-maker could appear biased without actually being biased); State v. Moss , , 734-35 (Minn. 1978) (limiting a defendant who untimely raised allegations that a district court judge was biased to presenting evidence of actual bias, rather than just appearance of bias); Wiedemann v. Wiedemann , 228 Minn. 174 , , 812 (1949) (noting that a judge could be disqualified for appearance o
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(finding scissors to be a dangerous weapon because “although defendant did not use the scissors during the robbery he had them on his person and intended to use the m if their use became necessary”); (finding a knife dangerous when it was di
State of Minnesota v. Brock William Orwig Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Brock William Orwig Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that the intent to use scissors as a weapon “if their use became necessary” was sufficient to sustain a conviction for aggravated robbery); (stating that the jury could have found the defendant used a knife as a dangerous weapon wher
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mangan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Michael John Mangan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(“Because we conclude that the judge's comments do not demonstrate actual bias, we need not, and do not, decide whether the alleged bias constitutes structural error.”); - 35 (Minn. 1978).
Daniel Morris Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Daniel Morris Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State v. Slaughter 691 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 2005
State v. Slaughter 691 N.W.2d 70 Minn. 2005
-33, 736 (Minn.1978) (upholding armed robbery conviction where defendant possessed a large pair of scissors during robbery).
State v. Plantin 682 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Plantin 682 N.W.2d 653 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Cepeda 588 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Cepeda 588 N.W.2d 747 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See, (scissors considered to be a dangerous weapon); -91 (Minn.App.1995) (hands and feet held to be dangerous weapons), review denied (Minn. Jan.
State v. Patton 414 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Patton 414 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-36 (Minn.1978); see Minn.Stat.
State v. Trott 338 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1983
State v. Trott 338 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1983
See, (gasoline); (boots); (automobile); (scissors).
LaMere v. State 278 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979
LaMere v. State 278 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1979
where the issue was whether a person could be convicted of aggravated robbery if he kept his “dangerous *556 weapon” in his pocket and did not use it.