Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olson v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield, 269 N.W.2d 697.

22 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. W., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, (concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion by questioning witnesses when counsel had “partially covered the same ground”).
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Velt Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Velt Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that the traditional right of trial courts to call and interrogate witnesses “is consistent with the responsibility of the Court in insuring a speedy and just determination of the issues”); Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, (finding that the district court properly exercised its authority in questioning a witness where counsel’s questioning had “partially covered the same ground”); (holding that, in a civil court trial, a trial judge’s clarifying questions to
Tyler Grant Thompson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
614(b) (allowing a district court to question witnesses called by a party); see also Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, (“It is within the discretion of the [district] court to question a witness called by a party.”).
Chad Henry Lee Jackson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
614(b) (allowing a district court to question witnesses called by a party); see also Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield , (M inn.
In the Matter of: Carole Anne Rosemary Dobson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, see also Minn. R. Evid.
John Howard Bartz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John Howard Bartz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[I]t is within the discretion of the trial court to question a witness called by a party.” Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
Elwood v. Horace Mann Insurance Co. 531 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Elwood v. Horace Mann Insurance Co. 531 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
52.01; Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Anda Constr.
Sazama Excavating, Inc. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 521 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Sazama Excavating, Inc. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 521 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Carlson 442 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
North Star Mutual Insurance Co. v. Carlson 442 N.W.2d 848 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota
Marriage of Sheeran v. Sheeran 401 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Sheeran v. Sheeran 401 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
NAT. FARMERS UNION PROP. & CAS. v. Anderson 372 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
NAT. FARMERS UNION PROP. & CAS. v. Anderson 372 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Boroos v. Roseau Agency, Inc. 345 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Boroos v. Roseau Agency, Inc. 345 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc., Olson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
Miles v. City of Oakdale 323 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1982
Miles v. City of Oakdale 323 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1982
Enderson v. Kelehan, 226 Minn. 163 , (involving surface drainage rights)