Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Merrill, 274 N.W.2d 99.
- Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc. 621 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc. 621 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- State v. Voorhees 596 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1999
-
State v. Voorhees
596 N.W.2d 241
Minn. 1999
We review the evidence in the record “in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict and assume that the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved contrary evidence.”
- State v. Brown 597 N.W.2d 299 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
State v. Brown
597 N.W.2d 299
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
We “must assume that the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contradictory evidence.”
- State v. Pilot 595 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1999
- State v. Pilot 595 N.W.2d 511 Minn. 1999
- State v. Doppler 590 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1999
- State v. Doppler 590 N.W.2d 627 Minn. 1999
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- State v. Miles 585 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1998
- State v. Scott 584 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Scott
584 N.W.2d 412
Minn. 1998
1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966); ).
- State v. Walker 584 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1998
- State v. Walker 584 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 1998
- State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
- State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
- State v. Whittaker 568 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 1997
- State v. Johnson 568 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1997
- State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
- State v. Riley 568 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 1997
- State v. Folkers 562 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Jones 566 N.W.2d 317 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Jones
566 N.W.2d 317
Minn. 1997
1602, 1628 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
- State v. Folkers 562 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
- State v. Dominguez-Ramirez 563 N.W.2d 245 Minn. 1997
- State v. Cooper 561 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Cooper
561 N.W.2d 175
Minn. 1997
(“[Defendant’s] actions in going into the kitchen, obtaining the knife, returning to the bedroom, and stabbing the victim numerous times reasonably imply that he had determined to kill [the victim].”).
- In Re the Welfare of S.M.J. 556 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- In Re the Welfare of S.M.J. 556 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Wagner 555 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Wagner 555 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Ring 554 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Ring 554 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Paul 548 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1996
-
State v. Paul
548 N.W.2d 260
Minn. 1996
In order to establish probable cause, the police must show that they “reasonably could have believed that a crime has been committed by the person to be arrested.” (), aff'd, 495 U.S. 91 , 110 S.Ct.
- State v. Holmberg 545 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Holmberg 545 N.W.2d 65 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
- State v. Atkins 543 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1996
- State v. Atkins 543 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1996
- State v. Hince 540 N.W.2d 820 Minn. 1995
-
State v. Hince
540 N.W.2d 820
Minn. 1995
See also State v. Slomnski (although police made improper statements to the suspect, suggesting that they had influence with the county attorney, the statements were not promises and were not the sort that would prompt an innocent man to confess); (even though defendant may have concluded from what the police said regarding degrees of homicide that he would be charged with manslaughter rather than murder, they did not say that he would be so charged).
- State v. Netland 535 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1995
- Dale v. State 535 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1995
- State v. Netland 535 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1995
- Dale v. State 535 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 1995
- State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995
- State v. Wilson 535 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1995