Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Merrill, 274 N.W.2d 99.

559 citing documents.

State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
State v. Williams 535 N.W.2d 277 Minn. 1995
515, 521-22 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); (citing Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct.
State v. Pierson 530 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1995
State v. Pierson 530 N.W.2d 784 Minn. 1995
State v. Burns 524 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Burns 524 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
State v. Ouk 516 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1994
State v. Trong Kim Huynh 504 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Trong Kim Huynh 504 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
State v. Swanson 498 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1993
State v. Swanson 498 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1993
State v. Dahl 498 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1993
State v. Dahl 498 N.W.2d 258 Minn. 1993
State v. Gamez 494 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Gamez 494 N.W.2d 84 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Thunberg 492 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1992
State v. Thunberg 492 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1992
State v. Needham 488 N.W.2d 294 Minn. 1992
State v. Barner 486 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Barner 486 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
917, 920 , 9 L.Ed.2d 922 (1963); -07 (Minn.1978).
State v. Berry 484 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1992
State v. Berry 484 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1992
“In reviewing a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, we are limited to ascertaining whether, given the facts in the record and the legitimate inferences that can be drawn from those facts, a jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty of the offense charged.”
State v. Brovold 477 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Brovold 477 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Battin 474 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Battin 474 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
In Re the Welfare of J.G.B. 473 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of G.D. 473 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of J.G.B. 473 N.W.2d 342 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
ANALYSIS In reviewing a claim of insufficient evidence, this court must ascertain whether “given the facts in the record and the legitimate inferences that can be drawn from those facts, a jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty of the *345 offense charged.”
In Re the Welfare of G.D. 473 N.W.2d 878 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In reviewing an insufficiency of evidence claim, this court must determine whether “given the facts in the record and the legitimate inferences that can be drawn from those facts, a jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty of the offense charged.”
State v. Angulo 471 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Angulo 471 N.W.2d 570 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Thomas 467 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Thomas 467 N.W.2d 324 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
Followed State v. Johnson 463 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 1990
we held that involuntary statements by defendants must be suppressed.
State v. Kraushaar 459 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Kraushaar 459 N.W.2d 346 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
State v. Bliss 457 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1990
State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
State v. Gray 456 N.W.2d 251 Minn. 1990
Police officers are encouraged “to obtain arrest warrants whenever possible.”
McConnell v. City of Mankato 456 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
McConnell v. City of Mankato 456 N.W.2d 278 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
State v. Schaeffer 452 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1990

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by