Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Merrill, 274 N.W.2d 99.

559 citing documents.

State v. Clayborne 404 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Butzin 404 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Franson 403 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of L.B. 404 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Anderson 404 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Struss 404 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Struss 404 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Butzin 404 N.W.2d 819 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Anderson 404 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of L.B. 404 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Franson 403 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Skinner 403 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Skinner 403 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Our review of sufficiency of the evidence is limited to ascertaining whether the trier of fact gave “due regard to the presumption of innocence and to the State’s burden of proving the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt * * ( ).
State v. Sollman 402 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Sollman 402 N.W.2d 634 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Krech 399 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Krech 399 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. French 402 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. French 402 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Blair 402 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Blair 402 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Hole 400 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Currie 400 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Currie 400 N.W.2d 361 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Hole 400 N.W.2d 430 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of W.W.M. 400 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of W.W.M. 400 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. French 400 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Blawat 399 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Blawat 399 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. French 400 N.W.2d 111 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
We have reviewed the record and conclude that under the appropriate standards for review of criminal convictions, the evidence is sufficient to sustain appellant’s convictions.
State v. Nunn 399 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Nunn 399 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Travica 398 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Travica 398 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Klimek 398 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Klimek 398 N.W.2d 41 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1986
State v. Anderson 396 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 1986
State v. Fox 396 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Fox 396 N.W.2d 862 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(judging credibility of witnesses is clearly function of jury).
State v. Tuomi 396 N.W.2d 847 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Reuer 396 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Reuer 396 N.W.2d 668 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Erickson 396 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Erickson 396 N.W.2d 265 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Mesich 396 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Mesich 396 N.W.2d 46 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the supreme court set forth the basic principles to be followed in evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence: In reviewing a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, we are limited to ascertaining whether, given the facts in the record and the legitimate inferences that can be drawn from those facts, a ju
State v. Hernandez 395 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986