Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Merrill, 274 N.W.2d 99.

559 citing documents.

State v. Crego 395 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hernandez 395 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Crego 395 N.W.2d 140 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Warborg 395 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Daby 394 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Daby 394 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Warborg 395 N.W.2d 368 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Dahm 394 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. McBroom 394 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. McDonald 394 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Dahm 394 N.W.2d 589 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
*591 (citations omitted) ().
State v. McBroom 394 N.W.2d 806 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. McDonald 394 N.W.2d 572 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Holmes v. State 394 N.W.2d 818 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Wahl 394 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Wahl 394 N.W.2d 536 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Ahiagbede 394 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Walker v. State 394 N.W.2d 192 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Ahiagbede 394 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Pita-Iglesia 393 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Pita-Iglesia 393 N.W.2d 524 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sutherlin 393 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Roberts 393 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sutherlin 393 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
* * * (citations omitted) ().
State v. Roberts 393 N.W.2d 385 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Larson 393 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Larson 393 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Scheu 392 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Gelhar 392 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Scheu 392 N.W.2d 640 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Gelhar 392 N.W.2d 609 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Montour 392 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Montour 392 N.W.2d 576 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sheldon 391 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Sheldon 391 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
A reviewing court cannot retry the facts and must “assume that the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contradictory evidence.”
State v. Hammerstad 391 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hammerstad 391 N.W.2d 39 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the court’s finding, as we must, we affirm.
State v. Miles 391 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Miles 391 N.W.2d 23 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Stoffel 388 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Rahier 389 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Stoffel 388 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Rahier 389 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
State v. Andrews 388 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1986
1336, 1342 , 10 L.Ed.2d 513 (1963) (volun-tariness); (citing Miranda and Haynes standards).
State v. Hammer 387 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Hammer 387 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
: We cannot retry the facts, but must take the view of the evidence most favorable to the state * * *.
State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986