Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Merrill, 274 N.W.2d 99.
- State v. Blegen 387 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Munoz 385 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Munoz 385 N.W.2d 373 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Nordstrum 385 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Poppy 385 N.W.2d 60 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
State v. Poppy
385 N.W.2d 60
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
the defendant told police officers that he drank 12 beers and three-fourths of a pint of brandy on the night of the killing.
- State v. Nordstrum 385 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Race 383 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1986
- State v. Race 383 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1986
- State v. Erdman 383 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Erdman 383 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blair 381 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blair 381 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Stanifer 382 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Moore 381 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Moore 381 N.W.2d 515 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Stanifer 382 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Ackerman 380 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Ackerman 380 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Jones 381 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Ford 381 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Smith 380 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Smith 380 N.W.2d 611 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Ford 381 N.W.2d 30 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Jones 381 N.W.2d 44 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Stauffacher 380 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Dooley 380 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Dooley 380 N.W.2d 582 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Stauffacher 380 N.W.2d 843 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Beard 380 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Edwards 380 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- State v. Blais 379 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Blais 379 N.W.2d 236 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Patten v. State 378 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Peterson 379 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Patten v. State 378 N.W.2d 648 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Peterson 379 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Mickelson 378 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
State v. Mickelson
378 N.W.2d 17
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
the supreme court stated: In reviewing a claim of insufficiency of the evidence, we are limited to ascertaining whether, given the facts in the record and the legitimate inferences that can be drawn from those facts, a jury could reasonably conclude that the defendant was guilty of the offense charge
- State v. Brown 376 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Brown 376 N.W.2d 451 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Smith 374 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Miller 374 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Smith 374 N.W.2d 520 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State v. Miller 374 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- State, City of Eagan v. Elmourabit 373 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1985
-
State, City of Eagan v. Elmourabit
373 N.W.2d 290
Minn. 1985
“The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution and it is necessary to assume that the jury believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contrary evidence.” see also
- State v. Budke 372 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1985