Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., 297 N.W.2d 260.

57 citing documents.

City Market & Halal Meat, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
19, 2024); see also Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., - 67 (Minn. 1980) (stating that “speculative, remote, or conjectural damages are not recoverable”).
Lagoon Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Silver Cinemas Acquisition Co., a Delaware ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Lagoon Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company v. Silver Cinemas Acquisition Co., a Delaware ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See, e.g., Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., -69 (Minn. 1980); -06 (Minn. 1977); Tate v. Scanlan Int’l, Inc., -74 (Minn. App. 1987), rev. denied (Minn. May 28, 1987).
Credo Salon and Spa, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
establish a causal relationship”); see also Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., (requiring a plaintiff to prove that lost profits were “the natural and probable consequences of the ac t or omission complained of” and that the requested amount of lost profits “is show n with a reasonable degree of certainty and exactness.” (citation omitted)); Polaris Indus.
J.C. Allen Co., Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(quoting Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., 7 (Minn. 1980)).
Steven T. Meister, M. D., John Does v. Avera Marshall d/b/a Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center, John Roes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Steven T. Meister, M. D., John Does v. Avera Marshall d/b/a Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center, John Roes Minn. Ct. App. 2016
and it is now generally recognized that the obligations of the parties need not be substantially equal for there to be a binding contract.” Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randall Norman v. Crow Wing Cooperative Power & Light Company Minn. Ct. App. 2016
rmissible conjecture and speculation” because “(1) stray voltage was first measured on the Norman farm in 2011, and (2) no evidence was offered that showed the difference between production before and after there was a claimed stray voltage problem.” While it is true that damages that are speculative, remote, or conjectural are not recoverable, Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., (citations omitted), the cooperative’s “speculation” argument regarding the damages is based on a challen
John Stratton v. Pop Dental, LLC, Karl Dexheimer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
John Stratton v. Pop Dental, LLC, Karl Dexheimer Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Although the law recognizes that it is more difficult to prove loss of prospective profits to a new business than to an established one, the law does not hold that it may not be done.” Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Alan Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc., Cirrus Holding Company, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Alan Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc., Cirrus Holding Company, Ltd. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Ross Wickenhauser v. Denise Esther Wickenhauser, n/k/a Denise Esther Peterson, (A14-0417), and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Robert R Elliott, individually, and as trustee of the Robert R. Elliott Revocable Trust and the Elliott Mandelheim … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert R Elliott, individually, and as trustee of the Robert R. Elliott Revocable Trust and the Elliott Mandelheim … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., (addressing issue of lost-profit damages).
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'n 834 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
See, e.g., HydraMac, Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc., 297 Minn. 118, 125
Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
Mattson Ridge, LLC v. Clear Rock Title, LLP 824 N.W.2d 622 Minn. 2012
See Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., (requiring a reasonable factual basis for an award of lost profits).
Larson v. Lakeview Lofts, LLC 804 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Larson v. Lakeview Lofts, LLC 804 N.W.2d 350 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Remote and speculative damages cannot be recovered, but there is no general test for identifying damages that are remote or speculative, and “such matters should usually be left to the judgment of the [district] court.” Jackson v. Reiling, 311 Minn. 562, 563 , see also Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., (“Uncertainty as to the fact of whether any damages were sustained at all is fatal to recovery.” (quo *359 tation omitted)).
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Cf. Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., -67 (Minn.1980) (holding that it was not unreasonable for the jury to award lost profits).
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. 565 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1997
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Nishika Ltd. 565 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1997
E.g., Hydra-Mac, d at 920 ; Polaris Indus, v. Plastics, Inc., Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
Di Ma Corp. v. City of St. Cloud 562 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Di Ma Corp. v. City of St. Cloud 562 N.W.2d 312 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
It contends the trial court erred under Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., (sufficient evidence for jury to find damages for loss of profits for new business based on evidence of profitability of similar businesses).
Imperial Developers, Inc. v. Seaboard Surety Co. 518 N.W.2d 623 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lassen v. First Bank Eden Prairie 514 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lassen v. First Bank Eden Prairie 514 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
Sports Page, Inc. v. First Union Management, Inc. 438 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Sports Page, Inc. v. First Union Management, Inc. 438 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc., -67 (Minn.1980) (holding that an unestablished business may recover lost prospective profits).
B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Mesabi Tire Co. 430 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1988
B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Mesabi Tire Co. 430 N.W.2d 180 Minn. 1988
Peters v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. 420 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Peters v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. 420 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Tate v. Scanlan International, Inc. 403 N.W.2d 666 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Anderson v. Estate of Benson 394 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Anderson v. Estate of Benson 394 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
Olson, Clough & Straumann v. Trayne Properties 392 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Olson, Clough & Straumann v. Trayne Properties 392 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
30, 1984) (-67 (Minn.1980)).
Spinett, Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. 385 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Spinett, Inc. v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. 385 N.W.2d 834 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.
Edling v. Stanford Township 381 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Edling v. Stanford Township 381 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(quoting Johnson v. Wright, 175 Minn. 236, 239 , 220 N.W.
Vault, Inc. v. Michael-Northwestern Partnership 372 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Vault, Inc. v. Michael-Northwestern Partnership 372 N.W.2d 7 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Cardinal Consulting Company v. Circo Resorts, Inc., -67 (Minn.1980).