Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Welfare of Solomon, 291 N.W.2d 364.

79 citing documents.

In Re: The Paternity of a Female child, born June 26, 2024. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
DECISION “There is a presumption [in juvenile-protection law] that natural parents should be entrusted with the care of their children, and they should not be deprived of custody except for grave and weighty reasons.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of S. S., Custodial Parent, A. S., Stepparent, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A20-0743 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re Welfare of Solomon , see also In re Welfare of J.K.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. V. and S. V., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In reviewing a termination -of-parental-rights order based on palpable unfitness, the “case relies not primarily on past history, but ‘to a great extent upon the projected permanency of the parent’s inability to care for his or her child.’” d 364, 368 (Minn. 1980) ().
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: P. L. G., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: P. L. G., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In a termination-of-parental-rights case, the district court relies “to a great extent upon the projected permanency of the parent’s inability to care for his or her child.” (citation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In a termination case, the district court “relies not primarily on past history, but ‘to a great extent upon the projected permanency of the parent’s inability to care for his or her child.’” ( (emphasis added)).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. T., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. T., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R. 750 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R. 750 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2008
On the other hand, we reversed the termination of a noncustodial mother’s parental rights on grounds of palpable unfitness in the absence of evidence that her conduct — consisting apparently of sporadic visitation — “has adversely influenced her child.” McDonald v. Copperud, 295 Minn. 440, 444 , (“sexual misconduct” in the form of cohabitation outside of marriage should not constitute palpable unfitness if it is not likely to have an adverse effect on the welfare of the child).
In Re the Welfare of A.V. 593 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re the Welfare of A.V. 593 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
See, (noting the “grave and weighty reasons” standard and also noting that “the best interests of the child are normally served by parental custody”).
In Re the Welfare of S.Z. 547 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1996
In Re the Welfare of S.Z. 547 N.W.2d 886 Minn. 1996
When considering termination of parental rights, the court relies “not primarily on past history, but ‘to a great extent upon the projected permanency of the parent’s inability to care for his or her child.’ ” ().
In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995
In Re the Welfare of A.D. 535 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 1995
For this reason, we exercise “great caution in [parental] termination proceedings, finding such action proper only when the evidence clearly mandates such a result in accordance with the statutory grounds.”
Matter of Dn 523 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
In re the Welfare of D.N. 523 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Matter of Dn 523 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-69 (Minn.1980) (conditions at time of trial and improvement of conditions that led to filing of CHIPS petition are analyzed).
In re the Welfare of D.N. 523 N.W.2d 11 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-69 (Minn.1980) (conditions at time of trial and improvement of conditions that led to filing of CHIPS petition are analyzed).
In Re the Welfare of J.S. 470 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of J.S. 470 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
“The primary purpose of the Juvenile Court Act is to ensure the welfare of minor children.”
Matter of Welfare of Sn 423 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Matter of Welfare of Sn 423 N.W.2d 83 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.J.L.B. 394 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of G.C. 394 N.W.2d 830 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of G.C. 394 N.W.2d 830 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.L.B. 394 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of S.A.V. 392 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of S.A.V. 392 N.W.2d 260 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Minn. Stat. § 260.221 (b)(5) (1984).
In Re the Welfare of S.G. 390 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of S.G. 390 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of B.M. 383 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of B.M. 383 N.W.2d 704 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In re Guardianship of D.M.S. 379 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of W.R. 379 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of W.R. 379 N.W.2d 544 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.A. 377 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of DDK 376 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of DDK 376 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Petition of MG 375 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Petition of MG 375 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.K. 374 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.K. 374 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. 369 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1985