Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gilchrist, 299 N.W.2d 913.

38 citing documents.

Maryam Yusuf Ahmed, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(considering a police officer’s knowledge of a suspect’s history of burglary offenses among the circumstances supporting reasonable suspicion that the suspect participated in a recent burglary), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
A25-1524 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(citing Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977)) (recognizing the propriety of an officer ordering occupants from a vehicle for his safety).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
knew Dahlin “to be a violent offender” and “was aware that [Dahlin] had served time in prison for an assault involving a weapon.” The Minnesota Supreme Court has upheld a protective search when the defendant “was known to carry firearms, and he had been connected with a homicide in which a firearm was apparently used.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(holding that police bulletin that suspect may have been involved in recent homicide, possessed firearms, and was wanted for questioning in Nebraska combined with officer knowledge of suspect’s criminal history of firearms-related offenses supported an investigatory stop); State v. Bellikka, 490
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 913, 916 (Minn. 1980).
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Marie Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Marie Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding informant’s tip that suspect may have been involved in recent homicide and possessed firearms and officer knowledge of suspect’s criminal history of firearms-related offenses supported a Terry stop); (holding police knowledge of a
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Patrick Ketz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Patrick Ketz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
B. The search A police officer may conduct a limited pat search of a seized person for weapons on less than probable cause if he can “point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion.” (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21, 88 S. Ct. at 1880).
State of Minnesota v. Chris William Savage Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Chris William Savage Minn. Ct. App. 2015
oper search is inadmissible as “fruit of the poisonous tree.” A. Whether the Search was Unlawful A police officer may conduct a limited pat search of a seized person for weapons on less than probable cause if he can “point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the intrusion.” (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 21, 88 S. Ct. at 1880).
State v. Flowers 734 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 2007
Distinguished State v. Flowers 734 N.W.2d 239 Minn. 2007
In Re the Welfare of M.D.R. 693 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Welfare of M.D.R. 693 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
State v. Askerooth 681 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2004
1868 (citations omitted)
State v. Waddell 655 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 2003
State v. Waddell 655 N.W.2d 803 Minn. 2003
(holding that search of area under front passenger seat of a validly stopped vehicle was justified for officer safety).
State v. Robb 605 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2000
State v. Robb 605 N.W.2d 96 Minn. 2000
(noting a “close case” but upholding search where defendant was known to carry firearms and was connected with both a homicide in which a firearm was used and another shooting).
State v. Richmond 602 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Richmond 602 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Holmes 569 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1997
State v. Holmes 569 N.W.2d 181 Minn. 1997
1868, 1880 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); -17 (Minn.1980).
State v. Payne 403 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Payne 403 N.W.2d 273 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
the court discussed the lawfulness of a stop and frisk for weapons.
State v. Lamar 382 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Lamar 382 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State v. Evans 373 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Evans 373 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Gobely 366 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 1985
State v. Gobely 366 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 1985
State v. Liljedahl 327 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1982
State v. Liljedahl 327 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1982
State v. Willis 320 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1982
State v. Willis 320 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1982