Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of Shoreview, 304 N.W.2d 320.
-
Mark Wocken, Relator,
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
–28 (Minn. 1981)), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
- In the Matter of the Application of USS Great River Solar LLC for an Interim Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Distinguished Lawrence J. Culligan, et al., Trustees of Lawrence J. Culligan Revocable Trust under Agreement dated June 21, 2001, … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
In re: County Board action notice on interim use permit request to operate a kennel on Parcel Number …
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Invs., d 320, 325 (Minn. 1981).
- John Schulz, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Almir Puce, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- A21-0106 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
-
Steven W. Hill, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Invs., d 320, 325 (Minn. 1981).
- Knife River Corporation-North Central, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Sno-Barons Snowmobile Club, Inc., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Jeffrey A. August, Relator v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 868 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Jeffrey A. August, Relator v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners
868 N.W.2d 741
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of Shoreview, (stating that neighbors’ objections to conditional-use permit application must be based on more than conjecture or speculation); Yang, d at 833 (finding neighbors’ anecdotal 14 comments insufficient when they contained no detail as to how t
- RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington 861 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 2015
- RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington 861 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 2015
- Whitefish Area Property Owners Association, Relators v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners, Minnesota-Iowa Baptist Conference Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Whitefish Area Property Owners Association, Relators v. Crow Wing County Board of Commissioners, Minnesota-Iowa Baptist Conference
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Invs., (indicating that when there was a plan for alleviating parking and traffic concerns, those concerns were not a proper basis for denial of a CUP).
- Volunteers of America-Minnesota v. City of Saint Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Volunteers of America-Minnesota v. City of Saint Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- David Vigstol, Relators v. Isanti County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- David Vigstol, Relators v. Isanti County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights 708 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 2006
-
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights
708 N.W.2d 162
Minn. 2006
Invs., (concluding that “the village acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying [a] special use permit for reasons which either had no factual bases or were not legally sufficient”); Minnetonka Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, Inc. v. Svee, 303 Minn. 79, 83-84 , (concluding
- CEMETERY v. City of Roseville 689 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- CEMETERY v. City of Roseville 689 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
- Yang v. County of Carver 660 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Yang v. County of Carver 660 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- PTL, LLC v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 656 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-
PTL, LLC v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners
656 N.W.2d 567
Minn. Ct. App. 2003
of Shoreview, -25 (Minn.1981); BECA d at 463 ; Good Value Homes
- Beca of Alexandria, L.L.P. v. County of Douglas Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners 607 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Beca of Alexandria, L.L.P. v. County of Douglas Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners 607 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- In Re Livingood 594 N.W.2d 889 Minn. 1999
-
In Re Livingood
594 N.W.2d 889
Minn. 1999
Investments, see also Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, -41 (Minn.1984).
- Trisko v. City of Waite Park 566 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
-
Trisko v. City of Waite Park
566 N.W.2d 349
Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Invs., -28 (Minn.1981) (reversing denial of conditional use permit for 19 quad homes because the plan standards, which required the applicant to demonstrate that “the proposal constitutes an ‘improvement’ on the plan and is consistent with the plan’s general intent and purpose” and that the proposed use “is equal to or b
- SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada
539 N.W.2d 264
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Investments, -25 (Minn.1981).
- NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 489 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- NBZ Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 489 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
- Northern States Power Co. v. Blue Earth County 473 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Northern States Power Co. v. Blue Earth County
473 N.W.2d 920
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Investments, (reversing denial of conditional use permit to construct multiple unit dwelling because of traffic and parking concerns where developer had agreed to eliminate these problems); (reversing denial of conditional use permit
- St. Croix Development, Inc. v. City of Apple Valley 446 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- St. Croix Development, Inc. v. City of Apple Valley 446 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
- Parranto Bros., Inc. v. City of New Brighton 425 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Parranto Bros., Inc. v. City of New Brighton 425 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Scott County Lumber Co. v. City of Shakopee 417 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Scott County Lumber Co. v. City of Shakopee 417 N.W.2d 721 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
- Good Value Homes, Inc. v. City of Eagan 410 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Good Value Homes, Inc. v. City of Eagan 410 N.W.2d 345 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- City of Barnum v. County of Carlton 386 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- City of Barnum v. County of Carlton 386 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1986