Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 289 N.W.2d 729.

32 citing documents.

In re the Final NPDES/SDS Permit for 3M Cottage Grove Center. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re Restorff 932 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 2019
In the Matter of the Application of Kimberly Baker. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
in arguing that dual roles within an agency do not violate due process unless the decision-maker is actually biased.
In the Matter of the Appeal of the Determination of the Responsible Authority for the South Washington County … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
t he commissioner defined “substantial evidence” as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion .” The commissioner also cited Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst , and Hennepin Cty.
Buchwald v. University of Minnesotsa 573 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Buchwald v. University of Minnesotsa 573 N.W.2d 723 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Dep’t of Natural Resources, (due process not violated so long as decision-maker remains unbiased).
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
State Ex Rel. Schaller v. County of Blue Earth 563 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1997
See, e.g., Archabal, d at 421-22; Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Dep’t of Natural Resources, -88 (Minn.1979); PEER, d at 867-68 .
In Re the Insurance Agent License of Thomas Casey, Sr., P.A. 540 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Insurance Agent License of Thomas Casey, Sr., P.A. 540 N.W.2d 854 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
McGuire v. County of Scott 525 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
McGuire v. County of Scott 525 N.W.2d 583 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See, (analyzing prudent and feasible alternatives to building county jail on historic site); Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Dep’t of Natural Resources, (analyzing prudent and feasible alternatives to building highway over a lake); Minnesota Public Interest Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun Club, (analyzing material adverse effect of noise pollution created by gun club expansion); County of Freeborn by Tuveson v. Bryson, 309 Minn
Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 494 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services 494 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Dep’t of Natural Resources, (due process not violated so long as decision maker remains unbiased).
In Re Occupational License of Hutchinson 440 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re Occupational License of Hutchinson 440 N.W.2d 171 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Application of Lecy, -99 (Minn.1981)
In Re the Real Estate Salesperson's License of Perron 437 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Real Estate Salesperson's License of Perron 437 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership 356 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1984
Minnesota Power, d at 329 ; Urban Council on Mobility v. Minnesota Dep’t of Natural Resources
Roach v. Commissioner of Department of Natural Resources 356 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Department of Natural Resources v. Todd County Hearings Unit 356 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Department of Natural Resources v. Todd County Hearings Unit 356 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
“Substantial evidence” has been defined as “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
Roach v. Commissioner of Department of Natural Resources 356 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
See County of Freeborn v. Bryson, 297 Minn. 218 , County of Freeborn v. Bryson, 309 Minn. 178 , Application of City of White Bear Lake, 311 Minn. 146 , and Urban Council
Contested Case of Richview Nursing Home v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare 354 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Contested Case of Richview Nursing Home v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare 354 N.W.2d 445 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 343 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1984
City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 343 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1984
Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 325 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1982
Whaley v. Anoka-Hennepin Independent School District No. 11 325 N.W.2d 128 Minn. 1982
Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593 304 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1981
Kroll v. Independent School District No. 593 304 N.W.2d 338 Minn. 1981
-33 (Minn.1980); -24 (Minn.1977).